60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not true as it's impossible to measure such a thing. But it makes sense that these numbers are what they are because ipv4 addresses are expensive.

[-] cron@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago

The article explains exactly what it did measure and what this does not mean:

Every number in this post describes attacker activity reaching GreyNoise sensors, not confirmed impact on third-party environments.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's not what the headline says

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

So read the article, then, before commenting

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today -3 points 2 weeks ago

Why? Why would I read an article that should be summarized in a headline? I don't have time to read 100,000 words a day

"Oh you should have read the 100 point fine print on our billboard instead of believing the 10000 point text"

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
60 points (95.5% liked)

Cybersecurity

9901 readers
115 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS