35
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemdro.id to c/linux@programming.dev

I’ve been using Linux for years, but as the proprietary alternatives get more aggressive with telemetry and adverts, I wanted to document the choices that actually keep my desktop predictable.

This isn't a manual, but a practical overview of my setup. From why I’ve settled on CachyOS and KDE Plasma for my main rig, to the reality of dealing with proprietary software and app compatibility in 2026. It’s just an honest look at the transition and why I’m done with the corporate defaults.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mrbigmouth502@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago

"The beauty of the AUR is that you stop waiting for developers to ‘support’ your OS. If the community wants it to work, it works. Period."

I take issue with this statement. The AUR can be very useful, but the packages in it are maintained by volunteers, so the onus ultimately falls on those volunteers to make sure those packages keep functioning. It's not uncommon for packages to fall out of date with upstream, and sometimes packages even end up being abandoned.

Arch is a fast-moving system, so packages for it need to be actively maintained to remain installable and functional. Flatpak packages are often volunteer efforts as well, but Flatpak at least allows packages to use specific versions of different libraries so that they can keep functioning.

[-] luciole@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

bro it's volunteers all the way down

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
35 points (87.2% liked)

Linux

13366 readers
261 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS