167
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux@programming.dev

woaw

also a good blog post about it https://xint.io/blog/copy-fail-linux-distributions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 30 points 5 days ago

There usually isn't a su binary installed on non-rooted Androids. If you're rooting it yourself anyways, there's no need to use the exploit.

[-] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 days ago

I'm not as smart as the people who make alternative android options. I was just hoping it would help them jailbreak more of goggle's bullshit so customers actually have a choice to go for an android OS which respects them and their privacy.

[-] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 5 days ago

grapheneOS has already vented on social media that theu are not affected because of how they configured SELinux and that the headline is therefore not correct

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116491317711428490

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 19 points 5 days ago

SELinux breaks a lot of android root exploits, way back in the day even dirty cow didn't work. It would get you "root" but not actually the full perms because of SELinux. Really good testament to the added security of MAC, it's one of the reasons I run apparmor on my systems

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'll be happy if I never have to look at SELinux or fapolicy ever again. Especially fapolicy because the documentation is shit.

It's the one thing I don't miss about being a sysadmin.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
167 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

13530 readers
379 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS