1803
Good friend (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DJSpunTheDisc@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I will, however, warn them about Manjaro, fuck it.

[-] Shinra_K@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

I've seen many comments about Manjaro, what's the deal with it? I used it shortly a few years ago but I didn't liked it

[-] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

My wife and I haven't had any issues with it, they're just easy to paint as the bad distro because it's supposed to uncomplicate Arch for your average user, but has had some certs fall through the cracks and they had kind of an asshole response to address it (thank God Gnome and Linux devs are never contentious folks), and apparently people don't read the warnings about enabling AUR in the package manager. Don't get me wrong, it's not the perfect distro, but it doesn't deserve nearly as much hate as it gets. It's not Canonical, pushing Amazon and telemetry by default ๐Ÿ˜† besides, it's got some cool features out of the box like one of the better default dualboot grubs I've seen by default, the ability to have multiple kernels installed simultaneously from multiple streams, and while it's common anymore, was one of the early adopters of providing Nvidia drivers on install. Lots of people have strong opinions on what distro is best, and Manjaro manages to be an easy one to point fingers at.

[-] MashingBundle@lemmy.fmhy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

There are legitimate criticisms of Manjaro, and these days there are better options like Archinstall or EndeavorOS, but yeah it's mostly just become a popular distro to shit on.

Canonical deserves way more hate than the Manjaro devs tbh.

[-] Nyanix@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Oh for real, I won't deny there's legit plenty to call them out on, and as well we should, but I was always baffled that they just how much they get, especially compared to Canonical.

[-] s_s@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Manjaro piggybacks off of Arch and some Arch users want to be obnoxious about it.

There's nothing wrong with the distro, itself.

The maintainers have done some inconsequential noob-ish things with the site's website, and the in-house package manager (pamac) had a bug that took down the AUR once and Arch users that couldn't host their own website if they wanted to like to point fingers and troll.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
1803 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21143 readers
1553 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS