0
NFTs do have a use value
(hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2021
0 points (NaN% liked)
technology
23289 readers
142 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
NFT's pay capital gains tax, no? (in the us)
It's the long con—if you buy an NFT, get it appraised at some crazy high value, then donate it to a museum or something that counts as a donation and it's a tax writeoff. I buy an NFT for $20, I get it appraised at $20 million and then I donate it, and now I'm paying $20 million less in taxes on my other income. This is how art works, I'm positive it'll be how NFTs work as well, except this is even easier since there's nothing physical at all.
I see this a lot on the internet but it's only partially true, like it only happens for the 0.1% of collectors who can afford to slosh $80m in wet paintings into freeports every season. The vast majority of collectors just want to sell their work for more then they paid for it 20 years ago. Return expectations are still wildly inflated, but the whole market actually isn't just a laundering scheme, and most "investors" in conventional art break even at best.
Source: I'm the brilliant but sexy art history major in every airport novel you've read
Oh for sure, only the 0.01% or higher who can afford this do this. You're right that most investors are doing this because they hope to sell for more than they buy, and will have to pay capital gains tax.