24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ozoned@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Wonder how this affects direct RHEL copies such as Rocky or Alma.

I was at Red Hat when they moved CentOS to Stream and a lot of us were VERY unhappy about it. Kind of knew the writing was on the wall for them when Red Hat hugged them closer.

I don't get this move, other than to fight direct copies of RHEL, such as Rocky or even Oracle. This might push those folks to have to follow CentOS stream, which is NOT RHEL.

Though I don't know how the copies do their builds now.

[-] ipha@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't affect them much, it just means they'll need a single RHEL subscription.

[-] ozoned@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Wonder if a dev subscription is enough.

[-] ipha@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Legally they must provide source to anyone they provide binaries to.

[-] caron@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It would count as an unauthorized use of the subscription, so Red Hat wouldn't keep doing business with them, and wouldn't receive the source code.

[-] ipha@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

That sounds like a giant GPL violation if sources are provided under the condition that you don't use them.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17550 readers
13 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS