184
Disney Mocked for Ludicrously Fake CGI "Actors" in Crowd Scene (futurism.com)
submitted 1 year ago by kid2908@slrpnk.net to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://derp.foo/post/317313

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 year ago

How the fuck can they be so greedy?

They make bazillions of dollars per year (if not per month), and they are unwilling to pay just a bit of money for extras.

Fuck film execs, I hope there is another strike.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Because we live in a system where paying more for doing the right thing will get fired and sued for lost profits as a CEO. If you run a publicly traded company, you are legally beholden to make the decision that yields the most profit, full stop.

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago

I keep seeing people regurgitate this nonsense.

Source or gtfo.

[-] davysnavy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Bro are you dumb

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I'm as cynical as anybody else and there was a time I also would have repeated it as well.
But.... show me the law. Show me where it says this.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_suit

I don't know where you live so I can't quote your local laws to you, but in this age of information you can Google terms and they will present relevant links. You should try it sometime.

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Your phrasing was "legally beholden" which suggests to me that a law exists requiring directors and officers to choose the most profitable path. The wikipedia page you linked does not mention any such law. It describes a type of lawsuit that investors can bring against those running the company.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Perhaps they didn't use the right words. Iirc the correct term is 'fiduciary duty'. A publicly traded company has a fiduciary duty to create value for shareholders.

The duties of some fiduciaries have been codified, for example, the statutory duty of skill and care which is imposed upon trustees by section 1 of the Trustee Act 2000 (TrA 2000) and the relationship between company directors and the company under the Companies Act 2006

https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/guidance/fiduciary-duties

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are only legally beholden to do what their shareholders collectively want. While it's not necessarily just for profit, if the shareholders are only demanding more profits, that's how the company will behave.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There will be no sources provided because there are no sources to prove it.

load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
184 points (93.8% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

17 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
admin@lemmy.film