2019
me🚫irl (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 1 year ago by Masimatutu@lemm.ee to c/me_irl@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 80 points 1 year ago

Hot take: I don’t want / need more people to use adblock.

Right now it is in a good position where the numbers just are not that high for advertisers to really give a hoot. Yes there is the ocasional shit like with YouTube, but the thing is - they are not really trying, they only put enough effort in to inconvenience, hoping more people will drop blocking.

However, if more people start blocking, I think they will be forced to find more concrete solutions, like the whole DRM fiasco.

[-] ashe@lemmy.starless.one 35 points 1 year ago

I could be wrong but I don't think there even is a way to fully prevent adblocking without something like the proposed web integrity API, since it's all clientside and the browser can easily just choose not to render any ads.

Overall I do agree that less people using adblocks means less attention from corps and less adblock-blocks like youtube's, but I'm conflicted on whether that's a good enough reason to have most people suffer through so many ads.

[-] persolb@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Even with web integrity, I don’t see anti-Adblock working. We’re almost at the point that client side AI can screen capture the web page and recreate it sans-ads.

And there are probably simpler solutions to bypass anti-adblock

[-] AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I barely know how any of this works, but couldn't Google just decide to not send video content on YouTube until X number of seconds have elapsed, so having ad blockers would block ad content, but not make it faster to see the video?

[-] kugiyasan@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

They probably could, but I think the risk of directly affecting the normal user experience is too high. That would for example mean that preloading videos will be trickier, and that there is a high chance that there will be a 3 seconds of silence between the ad and the content.

[-] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Still won't help, I would gladly wait 60s to avoid having scams and car salesmen shout at me for 10s.

[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe not prevent entirely, but I am sure they can make it extremely inconvenient to block. Part of the reason I pay for Youtube Premium is that it would be just too much of a hassle to set up PiHole and manage it, to get that ad-free experience across all of my devices.

[-] DroneRights@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Wasn't that hard to set up youtube vanced on my phone

[-] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

When I used android vanced was the biggest frustration ever, every couple of days I had to reinstall it which was a pita, especially because the realisation came just as I began my commute. Back then I was a broke college student, if I had cash back then I would have gladly payed for premium.

Now I have switched to apple, afaik something like PiHole would be the only thing to get ad-blocked youtube on my TV plus it comes bundled with YouTube music

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
2019 points (99.1% liked)

me_irl

4 readers
2 users here now

Selfies for the soul.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS