2202
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

I'm all for an individual decreasing their own consumption for the environment. I try to do that. But decreasing someone else's quality of life is where it gets dicy. You can very easily get discrimination.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago

degrowth doesn't mean worse quality of life, in many instances it very much increases quality of life.

would you not prefer to work half as much as you do? we can have that with degrowth.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm misunderstanding degrowth. Is it trying to decrease GDP? How does it do that? Or is it moreso increased worker rights and protections with decreased GDP growth as a byproduct? Because I'm all for the second version.

[-] kmaismith@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

IMO Degrowth would have to start with finding better, less destructive metrics than GDP to measure and plan economic prosperity with

[-] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

There is an abundance of other methods and actual economists use those other methods.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
2202 points (92.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5699 readers
694 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS