59

A federal appeals court blocked a racist Florida law that restricts Chinese citizens from buying land from being enforced against the two people who sued the state. The court did not, however, block the law entirely; it's still in effect for everyone else. One of the judges, Nancy Abudu, agreed that this was a blatant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the ACLU of Florida intends to continue fighting to prevent this law from being enforced more broadly.

This fight isn't over, but this decision certainly acknowledges the discriminatory nature of this law and is a big win.

(Taken from an email sent to me by Never Again Action.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 9 months ago

Damn, I think we have a new record for impotent angry lib! A full 8 hours of an internet tough guy being racist, ableist and homophobic while insisting that they're not any of those things because they feel like they aren't those things, despite ample evidence to the contrary from their comments.

Been a while since I've seen a classic internet tough guy, surprised they're not challenging people to fights in parking lots. Based on how glued to this thread they've been for 8 hours, I would guess it's because standing up out of their chair leaves them winded.

[-] Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 9 months ago

A full 8 hours of an internet tough guy being racist, ableist and homophobic while insisting that they’re not any of those things because they feel like they aren’t those things, despite ample evidence to the contrary from their comments.

This phenomenon fascinates me. As far as I have managed to understand it, it is because while a marxist will identify the use of perjorative language that attempts to brand someone else as homosexual, disabled, etc. in order to denigrate them as inherently reactionary due to how it implies that all of those things are negative, a liberal will not consider such an act to be homophobic, ableist, sexist and so on as long as you do not maintain that behaviour with most people of said group. In their mind, being ok with most people of the LGBT community makes you not homophobic despite frequently using the word "c-cksucker" against men they don't like, being ok with most women makes them not sexist despite calling women they don't like "b-tches", and so on.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 9 months ago

In short, "it's ok as long as i don't say it into their faces", which is perfectly consistent with ideological cornerstone of liberalism being hypocrisy.

[-] Flamingoaks@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 9 months ago

its more like "its ok as long as its "deserved""

[-] Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 9 months ago

Exactly. In their eyes, the instant a person opposes liberal interests, anything and everything against them, including tools of systemic oppression such as homophobia, racism and sexism, is fair game, and that won't make you a reactionary unless you use those only against "deserving" people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

US News

2043 readers
49 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS