163
submitted 6 months ago by alyaza@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

archive.is link

The [tunnel's] accelerants cure the grout that seals the tunnel’s concrete supports, helping the grout set properly and protecting the work against cracks and other deterioration. They also seriously burn exposed human skin. At the Encore dig site, such burns became almost routine, workers there told Nevada’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration. An investigation by the state OSHA, which Bloomberg Businessweek has obtained via a freedom of information request, describes workers being scarred permanently on their arms and legs. According to the investigation, at least one employee took a direct hit to the face. In an interview with Businessweek, one of the tunnel workers recalls the feeling of exposure to the chemicals: “You’d be like, ‘Why am I on fire?’”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think that's where the Hyperloop fits in: on Earth, it isn't practical to keep the required level of vacuum, but it would be quite easy on Mars. At the same time, they need to perfect the tunnel digging process, and cars are the excuse to do it on Earth.

[-] billhicksghost@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago
[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

Kind of ironic that video has an ad for a "mental hygiene" app... when a good first step would be not watching that sort of videos... but let's go point by point:

  • Logistics: that's SpaceX. Starship is planned to carry up to 100 people at once. As for trip duration, think XV century ships on multi-month long trips: tough, but survivable. Will need unmanned supply trips, but as it says, some could fail, just send more. Manned trips... if they're full of volunteers, some could fail too (plenty more where those came from).
  • Justification: because. Same as always: adventure, fame, science. Probably no raping indigenous population and robbing them of gold, but still. People get into F1 cars, skydive, free climb, etc. Some die, that doesn't stop the next ones.
  • Living on Mars: yes, probably in underground habitats. Definitely not "just the 1%", the plan is to have indentured labor, so everyone has a chance! (to be a slave, but on Mars) Premature death... see previous point.
  • Psychological effects: with a few hundred people, same as in any small society. Not everyone needs to be surrounded by billions of people 24/7.
  • ~~Terraforming~~: red herring. Musk doesn't have plans for that, so less BS.
  • Alternatives: night on Antarctica is 4320 hours, on the Moon it's 336 hours, night on Mars is 12 hours and 18 minutes. See the difference?
  • ~~Mars One~~: red herring. Not a Musk project, scammy from the beginning. That's two totally BS points.

It's a risky plan, but still a plan.

[-] billhicksghost@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

What absurd opening logic. The first person is a rocket engineer. He doesn't just play Kerbel Space, he designs rockets.

The schematics for Starship allows for at best 15-20 people. Supplies are a thing. The ability for humans to travel & survive for this distance is not established at all, nor is the ability to build structures, grow food, supply air & water, etc

Psychological effects: with a few hundred people, same as in any small society.

This confident nonsense is like discussing reality with an Iraq War Cheerleader Circa 2004-2007 .

There's no plan. To get to the Moon, Starship itself requires ~-15 refueling launches using a method that doesn't exist, despite the taxpayers giving the company 300+ million dollars to develop it.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

It's a ragebait video.

This confident nonsense is like discussing reality with an Iraq War Cheerleader Circa 2004-2007.

No point in continuing it then.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
163 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
221 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS