65
submitted 7 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] packadal@beehaw.org 5 points 7 months ago

What did you dislike about those movies?

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 7 months ago

Movie was great and I understand why they cut some stuff out from the story but I just don't get why they moved the timeline up so fast. Paul did all this before his sister was even born. Just bothers me.

[-] JillyB@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

I actually think it was a good decision. The sister doesn't play a huge part in the first book. The movie had to compress things for time. It would've been distracting to introduce a new character that doesn't do much during the crescendo near the end.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I see the reasoning. It just takes me out of the movie he did all this in a few months. I don't think any movie choices were bad just different. Like chany characters behavior is different than I recall. Like a 180. Is it believable yes. Is it what I expected nope.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
65 points (81.0% liked)

Not the Onion

4 readers
72 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS