234
Twitter is now X (www.twitter.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Synecdoche@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

He's not, though. He's had plenty of successful companies that have done some pretty amazing things, and he's become a multi-hundred-billionaire starting from a relatively extremely small amount of seed funding.

I suspect that his successes in other fields may have led him to think he would be just as good at running a social media company, which isn't going so well for him.

[-] TofuScramble@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago
  • Offer to buy Twitter for $44 billion
  • Try to back out when Twitter says "ok lol"
  • Get forced to complete the purchase
  • Saddle Twitter with the debt you now have as a result of buying Twitter
  • Invite all the previously-banned bigots and hatemongers back on the site
  • Make your staff's lives hell, including bullshit 'performance' stuff like checking how many lines-of-code they write, so most of them are either fired or leave on their own
  • Raise API prices sky-high, get ridiculed
  • Lock everything behind user log-in, logged-out users can't see anything
  • Rate-limit how many things logged-in users can do
  • Break widgets
  • Was once the public square of the internet, now weather services are moving to Mastodon
  • "why are we still losing money >:("
  • Initiate a half-assed rebrand to "X" but the logo, 𝕏, is literally just a mathematical symbol. Who needs copyright on your billion dollar company's brand identity, eh?

Whoa, be careful everyone, these are the slick moves of a master genius!

It's entirely possible that he was smart, I'm sure he was to an extent, but I believe that Space X and Tesla have better structures in places for managing/limiting Musk's direct influence, and I also believe that, like many of the super rich, he's succumbed to a form of right-wing brain rot over the years. His brain is now smooth and toxic.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I literally said in the comment that you're responding to that Musk isn't good at running Twitter.

[-] TofuScramble@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

It's a little worse than 'not going well', is my point.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not my point. I said that Musk had done well with his other non-Twitter companies and you responded "but look at how terrible he is at running Twitter!"

[-] TofuScramble@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget this bit:

“It's entirely possible that he was smart, I'm sure he was to an extent, but I believe that Space X and Tesla have better structures in places for managing/limiting Musk's direct influence, and I also believe that, like many of the super rich, he's succumbed to a form of right-wing brain rot over the years. His brain is now smooth and toxic.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
234 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
256 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS