553
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/workreform@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MiltownClowns@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

He subverted the will of the union using the might of the government. It doesnt matter what happened after that, as a union man that is the definition of anti worker.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

I agree, but leaving it out is still lying about what actually happened.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

It's not lying at all, omission is only a lie if it's misleading or nefarious, this is neither.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

You can certainly make that call for yourself. I disagree.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I mean it's a fact.... You didn't add context you added an excuse. "Oh it's not as bad because x"

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And can't defend your actions either. -10 for childish bullshit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
553 points (99.5% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
1059 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS