142

WinampDesktop/winamp - Licence violates github TOS · Issue #6 (github.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by makmarian@fedia.io to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

52 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] sweng@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why on earth would the license use Github's very niche definition? "Forking" as a software concept has been around for decades longer than Github or it's "fork" button has existed.

Also, how about reading the full psragraph?

You may not create, maintain, or distribute a forked version of the software.

(emphasis mine). It only does what you think it does if forking = copying. Which it doesn't.

Question to you: Github provides a button labeled "Download ZIP" for downloading a .zip-file containing the source. If I press that button, am I in your opinion creating a fork?

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

@sweng

> Why on earth would the license use Github’s very niche definition?

Maybe because it's ON GITHUB??

[-] sweng@programming.dev 0 points 3 weeks ago

Thst's not at all how it works. The definitions made in the TOS do not "leak" out of said TOS (unless the TOS specifies that, which it does not).

[-] chebra@mstdn.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

@sweng It's much more likely that the term follows the github's definition, because it's on github, rather than the wikipedia's definition, because why would it? You keep hanging on one word in a wikipedia article, let me fix that article and maybe we can stop this nonsense discussion.