226
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like a problem for later

Flippancy aside: the fundamental rule in all engineering is solving the problem you have, not the problem you might have later

[-] kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That doesn't apply to all engineering. In ChE, it'll literally blow up later...

[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

“Not blowing up later” would be part of the problem being solved

Engineering for future requirements almost always turn out to be a net loss. You don’t build a distillation column to process 8000T of benzene if you only need to process 40T

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

but you could design it to be easily scalable instead of having to build another even more expensive thing when you suddenly need to process 41T

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
226 points (86.7% liked)

Technology

58852 readers
4764 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS