Monero Network Scan Interesting Results (monero.town)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Eriq@monero.town to c/monero@monero.town

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Created a script to get the connections every time a new node connected. Everything looked normal in the peer list until I saw many nodes from:

100.42.27.* (around 200 peers)

193.142.59.* (around 200 peers)

199.116.84.* (around 100 peers)

209.222.252.* (around 150 peers)

91.198.115.* (around 150 peers)

The 100.42.27., 199.116.84., 209.222.252., and 91.198.115. all belong to "Lionlink Networks".

These are around 600 nodes that are under that ISP and account for 20-30% of all nodes seen from a 3 day survey span.

This looks suspicious to me and the massive amounts of nodes raises many red flags and does not look natural at all.

~~If these were malicious, in concept, with the 13 default IN/OUT peers, if all connected are malicious, the innocent one would have no other data to compare it to~~.

(Edit: Updated Theory: having many nodes has the ability trace transactions and block miners easier based on timing attack)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Wave@monero.town 6 points 6 days ago

Interesting observation, would it be difficult to detect such anomalies automatically?

[-] chickentendrils@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago

The attacker can just be smarter and use various ASNs + out-proxies for their backend.

My background is small-world network in distributed systems and anti-censorship software like Hyphanet. If the goal is to evict/lessen the purview of the metadata harvesting nodes then some version of web-of-trust + proof of work could be implemented.