submitted 2 days ago by humanspiral@lemmy.ca to c/climate@slrpnk.net

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A large project with cost data.

At $1.6B project cost for 3gw, that is a little over 50c/watt, and would typically produce energy costs excluding financing of 1c/kwh.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

I wonder what they are doing with possible surplus of energy.

[-] eleitl@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Interestingly enough, I have not heard of large hydrogen projects from water electrolysis in China.

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024

70 points (97.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5237 readers

296 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS