588
Simples. (lemmy.world)

I'm just picturing that robot from Star Trek (the one thinking about "this sentence is false") going "huh" and then blowing up........

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 59 points 3 months ago

it's hilarious that i see more press coverage/ discussion about the scandals every olympics than i see anyone talking about the winners. for the same reason reality tv ever became a thing

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

What’s wild here is there isn’t even a scandal. Conservatives are so obsessed with genitals and making up rules that now they can’t even decide what a woman is anymore and they’re making it these athletes’ collective problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hushable@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've seem more coverage on this than the Netherlands sending a convicted child rapist to represent their country

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 months ago

conservatives hate women and trans people more than they hate child rapists. one guess as to why...

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Was at a kid's birthday party and one of the dads brought up the subject, I asked if Michael Phelps should have been disqualified for having a genetic advantage over the people he was competing with and if Imane Khelif would have been treated that way 20 years ago, that shut him up real quick.

Only genetic clones from poor families are eligible now, everything else is advantage.

[-] DivineDev@kbin.run 53 points 3 months ago

Most internally coherent right wing opinion

(I'm like 80% sure it's a parody, you just can't tell these days)

[-] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

You say that like the right wing isn't 80% parody by this point :)

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Parody implies humor. The right wing is deadly serious.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

this is why more people should take college level biology/anatomy. Testosterone don't mean shit if you have a broken gene for testosterone receptors. A Y-chromosome also needs a functional SRY to trigger male phenotypes.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 24 points 3 months ago

Education isn't the problem. Bad actors with malicious intent are.

Back in the 90s, we used to say, "If people were more educated then..." and saw the internet as a way to deliver that education. Look how that turned out.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We used to have great quantities of much higher quality information available at our fingertips at every city library. The problem was never lack of access to information.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 39 points 3 months ago

Ultimately it comes down to fuckability.

[-] catbum@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

Christ, is this why anti-trans people are so focused on this shit? Because they can only think of people in terms of their fuckability through their own experiences? And through their tunnel vision, anyone with complex sex gene and hormone biology, and who present differently than the anti-trans person's gender or the gender they're typically attracted to, is automatically a filthy gender-bending subhuman??

"I am hot man. This is hot girl. These here are neither hot men like me nor hot girl like her. EX*CUTE THEM!!!"

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

That's part of it, yeah. A major part

Women are only good for one thing, that's the idea behind it all. Any time a woman isn't fuckable, they become lesser, no matter what other traits they have.

It's misogyny all the way down. Now, to the sides, there's also other prejudice involved, but the basis of the anti trans thought is the same basis as misogyny.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Almost. It's only fuckability, but through a lens of their own sexual repression. Gay is bad by definition and now they have to answer the question: Is it gay to find this attractive woman attractive if it used to have a penis?

The answer is: Labels don't matter. Everything's all individual, anyway. This person is attractive to you or not, period. There's a) no implication on your sexual preferences and b) if there was, who cares? Or rather, it's only you and your likes who care, and none of you have to.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

You can bet your ass that if she had some conventionally beautiful face, none of this shit would have happened.

[-] Randelung@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Or they'll confuse them the wrong way around.

"You look like a woman so you'll never be a man!" - "I used to be a man." - "I don't believe you!"

[-] Theharpyeagle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"I am hot man. This is hot girl. These here are neither hot men like me nor hot girl like her. EX*CUTE THEM!!!"

This is basically Jordan Peterson's entire brand

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I dunno man, people have a wide range of what they consider fuckable.

Frankly the fact that she can break me easily with one hand is a massive turn on. And with her determination and heart, she's WAY out of my league.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 32 points 3 months ago

Coming to the MCU next fall: Vagina Man.

Starring Robert Downey Jr.

[-] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 3 months ago

You're about 16 years too late. He's already world famous for his portrayal of Fe Male.

[-] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Aaayyoooooo

[-] occhionaut@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Fucking lmao

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago

All women are men and everyone is gay. There problem solved.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

EDIT: Ah, so this is what happens when you use imgflip in a browser that disables HTML5 canvas. Good to know. Lemme try again.

That's better.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago

They're actually a lot more consistent than this post makes them out to be. If you've got every single thing on their list that makes you a man - from the genitalia, to the physique, to the likes and dislikes, to the sexual orientation, to the behavior - you're a man. Same for a woman. If you're anything less, then they've just found their excuse to revoke your humanity in their own minds. You're different from them, and so now you're lesser than them. The same thing applies to people of different skin colors, religions, etc.

That's how those types of people have always been - they think of themselves as "nice people, but only to those who deserve it" which essentially just means a horrible person to everyone but people exactly like themselves. They honestly believe that any less means they're entirely justified to hate you. All they need is one little thing to point to, and any amount of harassment or worse is "only fair."

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

I know it's easy to believe there's some consistency there in the form of consistent hatred, but they actually aren't consistent in their hatred.

I agree with your premise philosophically: They demand that you must have every man trait, to be a man; and similarly for woman traits, to be a woman.

But, consider: only a tiny subset of people would ever be men or women in this formulation. If they believed this strictly and consistently, if they enforced it socially, they would be hopelessly outnumbered. Nobody would ever join the fascism club because nobody would be able to. They'd be wiped out quickly, too, because there would be very few opportunities to pass this ethos down to a following generation.

So in its application, they let all the rules go out the window, as long as you're saying you agree with them. Jewish person joining an anti-semitic hate group? You're on the team. Trans person calling for the end of trans healthcare? Welcome aboard. Latino group that opposes immigration? Come on in.

Fascism is about claiming you stand for one thing (which is, due to the nature of fascism, some kind of hate). But then actually taking in any person who is strategically useful to you as long as they don't rock the boat. The second there's a good reason to eject someone from the boat, they walk the plank. When it comes to gender, they'll accept any number of "disqualifying" characteristics--tall and broad-shouldered women, effeminate intellectual men, even literal trans people--as long as you're on board with hating the bad person of the week.

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

While that's true, they still believe you're lesser if you're different. The jewish person in the anti-semetic group and the trans person calling for the end of trans healthcare will still be the first on the chopping block if the goals of those groups come to fruition. They're like pets to them - animals that aren't on the dinner table only because they serve a better purpose alive than dead.

[-] mildlyusedbrain@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think the way I would phrase it is that they are very consistent in their belief that there are clear lines for defining gender.

But that view breaks down the moment their definitions have to engage with reality and they are faced with the difficulty of actually making thos classifications when faced with biological realities.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

Instructions unclear, got ceiling fan caught in my vagina

[-] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 months ago

Doctor: Okay, but when was your last period?

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

NORMAN, COORDINATE!

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

That text reminds me of:

It's very simple, Who is on first base...

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Aneurysm posting

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
588 points (95.8% liked)

tumblr

3447 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS