1
67
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

If you’re a US citizen, no matter where in the world, start by making sure you’re registered to vote. Many districts are gerrymandered, so you’ll want to register as the party that’s likely to win congressional and/or state legislative districts where you live, and vote in that party’s primary.

In addition to voting, you’ll want to influence politics beyond that. Your local races are a good place to start; cities and states control local land use and things like building codes.

To affect Congress, you’ll want to pick swing house districts or swing senate seats. Volunteer for a Democrat and donate accordingly.

For President, the reality is that the Biden/Harris administration has done far more than Trump would even consider, starting with the Inflation Reduction Act, for which Harris cast the tiebreaking vote in the Senate, and continuing through numerous executive actions. Getting involved in this race means volunteering, and if you can, donating to the Harris Victory Fund. If you’re giving really large amounts of money, and the logistics of it work, go to an in-person event and talk to the candidate or other official about climate:

2
3
submitted 15 minutes ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3
21
submitted 2 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The cut in emissions is from 2021 to 2022 is small — 2.4%

4
56
submitted 2 hours ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
5
21
submitted 8 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6
14
submitted 8 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7
11
submitted 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The infamous plant, closed since 2019, is getting a new lease on life after Microsoft agreed to buy its electricity to supply a growing fleet of data centers.

To be clear: Microsoft isn't directly using the electricity themselves; they're supplying it to others to offset their own use of fossil-fuel-generated electricity.

Also Washington Post coverage

8
10
9
61
submitted 18 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10
42
submitted 18 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11
31
submitted 18 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Archived copies of the article:

12
63
submitted 21 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

This post uses a gift link which may cap the number of times it can be viewed. After that, there are archived copies:

13
23
14
60
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
15
40
submitted 21 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Archived copies of the article:

16
130

‘Risk’ analyses largely ignore the dangers of the climate crisis. Unless we wake up to them, they will soon outweigh all others

17
43
submitted 1 day ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
18
127
submitted 1 day ago by 101@feddit.org to c/climate@slrpnk.net
19
36
20
23

Also: washington post coverage

Per the paper:

The GMST-CO2 relationship indicates a notably constant “apparent” Earth system sensitivity (i.e., the temperature response to a doubling of CO2, including fast and slow feedbacks) of ∼8°C, with no detectable dependence on whether the climate is warm or cold.

This is a very very big deal if it turns out to be valid in the present world.

21
47
22
17

I'll note that much of what is in this article has previously been published in Icelandic, but that's not very accessible to most of the world.

23
26
24
26
25
25
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
view more: next ›

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5055 readers
437 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS