91
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Fuck closed off mobile stores, it's all a scam.

Why are we ceding control over our personal computers to organizations who would limit our use of them?

If we have platforms capable of running arbitrary code then we should be able to do it.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

This is exactly it. It feels like about 99% of the crap these companies are pushing has no reason to be an app. Patreon is already primarily a web page. I guarantee you everything anyone cares about in the app you can do on the mobile version of the web page. Without being locked to the App Store/Google Play, and on (practically) any device. Isn't that what these companies should want in the first place? Totally device and platform agnostic, ready for the maximum amount of ~~suckers~~ potential paying customers to be able to access it?

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 24 points 7 months ago

I'm glad everyone is getting away from the Apple tax.

[-] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 18 points 7 months ago

I didn't even know Patreon had a mobile app. To me, Patreon is just one of those Big Adult Things you have to do on a computer. Seems to work just fine on mobile browser (Firefox for Android) though. Apple being mega greedy as usual.

[-] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 4 points 7 months ago

As someone who attempts to watch content on the iOS app, it’s a massive pile of shit and you’re right to use the browser only

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

The change from pay per episode to per month was a direct result of crApple's 30% tax. This hurt Patreon directly because a bunch of creators were pissed about the change and blamed Patreon for not fighting back, so they left. So Patreon has lost revenue over this, how much I have no idea but I know several of the podcasts I listen to have stopped asking you to pay via Patreon and are now asking you to donate via Substack or their private donation page.

[-] bluGill@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago

If you are releasing regularly - MWF, or every Sunday a monthly subscription works well. However if you are the type that makes good content but can't release often you want pay per episode. If you sometimes release twice a month, and sometimes go months between a release it isn't fair to ask your viewers to subscribe in months where they get nothing.

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

True, but the podcasters I heard about this from were posting at least once a week with one three times a week. They were all pissed and talked about how it would potentially hurt their subscribership. And most left because of the switch.

Having only been a patron and not a creator I have no way to back up any of this other than relay the things I heard from their rants... which there were quite a few of after the initial announcement.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Good. If I download an app with the intent to pay a content creator who uses that app to post content, I don't see why my choice of app store should have any bearing on how much of that money goes to the content creator, nor why the company who hosts that app on their store should get any income from said internal payments whatsoever.

Patreon (and everyone else) already pays Apple to simply host the app in their store. Apple is double-dipping by doing this and throwing an absolute fit comparable to that of a toddler who was just told "no".

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 7 months ago

Anyone who cares could have just gone to the website to make their payment but the real fucked up thing is that Apple ToS prevents them from disclosing that.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

They did disclose it, though. I got popups every time I logged in for weeks warning of the imminent additional cut Apple was going to take from donators/creators, which explicitly spelled out that payments made via other platforms would not be affected by this cut.

Maybe they were prevented from doing so in the iOS app, but they sure did it everywhere else.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 7 months ago

Maybe they were prevented from doing so in the iOS app

Yes that is what I was referring to.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Wow. That's pretty shitty.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Patreon app is literally their website. What does it do that the website does not? Notifications? Offline images? All of these can be done in your mobile browser.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Notifications, and no browser UI to get in the way. You can do a PWA, but that's beyond the scope of the average user.

[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 months ago

Don't forget data gathering.

And possibly but probably not; 2FA

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

https://xkcd.com/3074/

No app needed. Tell me if it works on your phone.

[-] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago

That comic says to do the opposite and to NOT implement browser notifications...

[-] pelya@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yup, because they are annoying, not because they do not work.

Pretty much every news site asks you to enable browser notifications.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

No browser UI to get in the way? Is it really that difficult to manage?

[-] miguel@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago

Too little, too late. I only know 2 creators that I supported who stayed through all this. Most quit patreon when it was announced... this is hardly the worst of the fees they charge people.

[-] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

Patreon's own fees are too high and were restructured in a scummy way.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

So how many quit? Can you name them? Where did they move to?

[-] miguel@fedia.io 0 points 7 months ago

7 out of 9, yes, one went to self-hosted, another left in favor of youtube directly, the rest in favor of twitch. The last two I follow on Patreon (Techmoan and My Mate Vince) just sorta rolled past the whole thing.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Interesting. AFAIK YouTube takes a 30% cut on donations.

Twitch takes 50% of subs.

Sounds like the self hosted person is the only one who actually made an improvement?

I might be out of date on my numbers.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
91 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

77711 readers
741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS