23
(page 3) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah, I can imagine having a mother like that would make it so that you can't enjoy life, damn.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 weeks ago

Kids need an outlet or they look for the real thing, not in a good way. Let them have their sites. Like anything in moderation though or only net porn will get you off later in life.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Is this an actual law suit by an actual person or from a Jane doe? If this is an actual person, this mom needs to start parenting their kid instead of making everyone else responsible for her kid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tartarin@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago

If she only sucked, we could have avoided this

[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

Just break both your arms. Is this teen fucking stupid?

[-] Puzzlehead@reddthat.com 0 points 4 weeks ago

Wouldn't he have to put in a fake birth date if it asked him to verify his age?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Elastigirl@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

I get the mom's point that she is worried for his safet but like, that's way too extreme, lol. Teens are eventually gonna be curious about it and learn about sex. There's nothing wrong with fancying the opposite gender and masturbation as long as the teen doesn't let the whole thing control his mind thus affecting his daily life if that makes any sense.

[-] BJ_and_the_bear@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Nothing to do with safety, she wants a payout

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's that second part that becomes an issue. The whole point of childhood is that you're not fully responsible for your own decisions. And the internet is very weird and bad about sex. Perhaps even moreso than it is weird and bad about everything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

hentaicity.com is going to be rough to live down.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -1 points 3 weeks ago

Mom is being responsible from protecting her children from filth. Respect.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

She isn't. After this lawsuit he will watch porn if he really wants to. She is wasting a bunch of her money for nothing. Money which she could invest in her family but is setting on fire instead.

[-] theologynerd@lemm.ee -1 points 4 weeks ago

let’s be real these companies are horrible and destroying the minds of millions of young men

[-] Zanathos@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I would argue that gambling sites and gacha games are much worse.

[-] theologynerd@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago

sure; maybe, maybe not. at least they don’t turn young men into womanizers with an unrealistic expectation of sexuality

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago

Am I the only one that thinks there’s something positive to stricter control of pornography?

Even if you love porn and grew up exposed to it as a kid, you gotta admit that there are psychological effects on avid adult viewers and more on minors.

Think about what was available as a kid, too. Wait 10 min for a 3 minute to load or just search pics. Now it’s a completely different overstimulating world that transforming how people relate to sex and themselves.

[-] breecher@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 weeks ago

Even if you love porn and grew up exposed to it as a kid, you gotta admit that there are psychological effects on avid adult viewers and more on minors.

No you don't. That is right wing propaganda completely unfounded by science. That porn addiction nonsense so many Americans babble about is a product of that propaganda, and doesn't actually exist.

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Wow. You don’t think porn addiction exists? Said like a true porn addict.

[-] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

If every person who disagrees with you counts as further evidence that you're right, then you're thinking in an unfalsifiable manner, which is the basis for many a flawed conclusion. It doesn't necessarily make you wrong, but you should really make sure to find justifications for your beliefs that are based on falsifiable reasoning instead. That's the best way to know if what you're believing is right or wrong, because you can try to falsify your beliefs in the way that you know them to be falsifiable, and if they still couldn't be falsified, then you can say "Well, I tried to disprove this, and it still passed that test!"

So, let me ask you this, what would, hypothetically, suffice to prove or at least suggest evidence that porn addiction does not exist? If your answer is "nothing", then you're in unfalsifiable territory.

[-] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Not enough to warrant uploads of your fucking license.

Also I really think its kind of goofy so many people are upset about porn when kids are exposed to violence in the media all the time.

Not that I think violent video games are the devil, my first memory of a game was GTA III lol, but I think seeing violence is probably worse than seeing sex.

At least if you take the American Puritan mindset out of it.

Either we chill the fuck out, or the next logical step is every rated 'M' game purchase or rated 'R' movie will require a license in a digital copy of your drivers license. Who knows, maybe next it'll be req'd for age-restricted social media content.

If you don't want your kids watching porn don't give them unfettered internet access.

If your a first worlder below the age of 45, and don't know how to do that, that's probably on you for not being able to intuitively use UX after decade of using computers in school and the workforce. Yes I expect modern humans who've been exposed to computing their entire life to use basic smartphone features, no hitting the pretty icons in the right order is not hard

If that you find that to be challenging god help you in raising an entire human child.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

seeing violence is probably worse than seeing sex

Yes, I mean, one is (ideally) about two (or more) people enjoying time they have together in an intimate way, the other is about hurting one another maliciously. I certainly prefer one of these things to be more prominent than the other

There is a discussion to be had about stuff like objectification and porn that doesn't depict people like, consenting, and such, but at least in an ideal I'd much rather have media that focuses on pleasure and love than hate and suffering

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago

Um, there is plenty of violence in porn…

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's mostly what I was referring to in my latter paragraph, yes

But the important takeaway is that it's not the core of what pornography is

[-] hansolo@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago

Not sure why you're getting down voted. Porn can absolutely become a behavioral addiction.

I used to work at a place where we had a lobby guard that watched porn on his phone all day (sound off). Not sitting there trying to jerk it, it was a compulsion. He would just be watching it while talking to other people, standing by the door...it was weird. He eventually got fired because he genuinely couldn't not watch porn.

That being said, I'm a huge privacy advocate, and while there are actually ways to anonymously be on a website and verify age, that's not how anyone is doing it. Things like signing up for an account on a site and scanning your ID are just abysmally stupid. There's a zero percent chance that this system as is doesnt lead to data theft and possibly even extortion.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

That being said, I’m a huge privacy advocate, and while there are actually ways to anonymously be on a website and verify age

How would that work? I'm not well-researched on this particular topic, so I'm curious how that should work.

[-] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Key signing maybe?

You get a cert which is cryptographically signed by your government. They can prove its signed with the governments root cert, showing that its someone over 18, but not who.

That being said the key identifiers will probably still be attached to you in some government db, just not on the porn site.

Though the government could force the pornsite to hand over any logged ids. Some people would say that's private, as they trust the government not to do stuff without a judges warrant.

As a trans woman relying on HIPPA to not be put on a list of those on HRT, lmao yeah fucking right. The christian taliban will connect the dots the first chance they get.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

71718 readers
2105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS