198
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 74 points 4 days ago

Thank God we’ve got the government here to protect us.

[-] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 57 points 4 days ago

Can't let the children have access to an Encyclopedia. Too dangerous. We have ChatGPT to give them all the information they need.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 41 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They might look up adult content like "balls" or "boobs"

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I remember doing that with a regular dictionary in middle school english class

edit: Yes I was scarred for life. Wish the government had intervened.

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 10 points 4 days ago

I did the same and look at me now. Let this be a warning to all you youngsters.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago

You realize that by banning Boobs we will save Gaza

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

heck I can still remember the way to the shelf in my local library that contained a nat geo book on various tribes that, of course, contained boobs.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

I can’t believe they let you see pictures of other naked humans as a small human!! What a failure of federal government

[-] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Ok realistically, at what age does it stop being not ok for a kid to see (ordinary) sex? Is it ever?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I hear, you have to get married before you're allowed into the presence of the other gender. And don't even think about showering without the cone.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

We had those in elementary school, along with corpses and a decapitated rhino. Maybe that explains Gen X.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 66 points 4 days ago

They should just block UK traffic like the porn sites do. This is an excellent way to lose a resource the government regularly uses.

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

Bold of you to assume the govt won’t just use the same VPNs they’ll ban the proles from having.

[-] cryptTurtle@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago

yeah pretty much the way it's always been. Rules for thee but not for me

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 4 days ago

Bold of you to assume the people advocating for this know how to use a VPN.

[-] Zombie@feddit.uk 48 points 4 days ago

To download Wikipedia to your computer for offline use, see here: https://kiwix.org/en/

[-] maam@feddit.uk 20 points 4 days ago

Check out the federated Ibis and data hoard where you can!

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago

Unfortunately, it's an older version from 2024. Last I heard there were some issues with the software used to create these.

Also the images are lower resolution.

[-] funkyfarmington@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

I sure wish Wikipedia would just grow a pair and outright block UK IP addresses.

[-] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

United Kingdom's new wiki article after the ban:

The United Kingdom (colloquially the U.K.) is a stupid butthead voyeur fetish state located in the Northern Hemisphere...

[-] Mesa@programming.dev 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Guess who becomes much easier to brainwash and control when the kids of this generation don't have access to unfederated information and educational outlets?

The adults of next generation!

Fuck this new world order.

[-] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 16 points 4 days ago

Is it just me or is this Labour government more far right than the previous Tory one?

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 days ago

This is actually a Tory policy, where the law was passed by the previous Tory government and came into force under labour.

That's not a get out of jail card, because they could have stopped it, and instead choose to continue it, just like they continued the NHS anti trans policies. Or the way they choose to continue the same austerity budget rules.

At this point, I'd say they're exactly as right wing as the Tories.

[-] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago

So it just seems like they're further right because every successive Tory government is further right than the previous one and Labouare just Tories?

[-] steeznson@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Labour have always had a bad track record of civil liberties. Although as the other reply notes this was a Tory policy initially, I've not gone over the proposed amendments to see if they'd have implemented it slightly differently (I suspect not). Unfortunately policies like these are both popular and free for the govt to implement so it's literally a no-brainer for MPs to vote through without thinking about consequences.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

They're gonna lose next election harder than Tories and I'm not even going to feel sorry for them.

It'll fuck me and my family over big time. More than Brexit did. I was always powerless to change anything here, they'll vote reform and they'll go even harder on this shit. Thatcher 2.0 incoming.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

You're blaming the current government for a law that was brought in by the previous government.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'm sorry, which government told us they're not going to discuss this even after the very system designed to bring things up to their attention passed the threshold?

You don't get to hide behind "it was done before we got here" when you're actively pushing for it.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

5284 readers
223 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS