113

Obama's comments appear in a new video supporting Gavin Newsom's Proposition 50 which would allow the California legislature to draw new congressional boundaries ahead of the midterms

Barack Obama has entered the political fray ahead of November's special election in California, accusing Republicans of attempting to "rig the next election" in a new ad backing Governor Gavin Newsom's Proposition 50, a ballot measure that could reshape the state's congressional map.

"Republicans want to steal enough seats in Congress to rig the next election and wield unchecked power for two more years," Obama says in the 30-second ad, urging voters to approve the proposal. "You can stop Republicans in their tracks."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

They also rigged the last election, and every election for several decades.

If all of the Geriatric Old Pedophiles various attempts at election fraud were prosecuted the US wouldn't be a failing fascist state today.

"Purging" voters, "gerrymandering", etc are morally and ethically no different than election fraud; you've already chosen treason against democracy.

[-] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

This entire attack on blue cities is so obviously an extension of the ballot box violence scare tactics used by the red hats during the last election.

I don’t see anyone pointing it out in the media.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] individual@toast.ooo 15 points 1 month ago

for the love of God, don't stick is with newsome

AOC is my top choice, but I know everybody has a million reasons why America wouldn't elect her as president.

But, I had this thought the other day, and I know this is nobody's dream team, but possibly the odd couple situation that just might work. Am I crazy for thinking a Pritzker-AOC ticket might actually have a decent chance?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

Reading the comments, it seems a lot of people here are totally fine to make good the enemy of perfect and repeat history all over again.

Enjoy the fascism folks. We’re in it for the long haul it seems.

[-] iloveDigit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

You're just now figuring out that we're in fascism, but telling people to "enjoy" it? lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago

Quit trying to make Newsome happen

It's really fucking tone deaf to push a Zionist in the face of cratering support for Israel among Democratic voters.

But then the Democratic party has a history of being tone deaf, like Biden picking Kamala "top cop" Harris for vp during the height of the George Floyd protests.

Biden won, but these stunts often fail.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

If someone isn't capable of making the easy call to be against genocide, then they absolutely can't be trusted to be defenders of democracy.

We gotta quit pretending it's about this one issue or that one issue. Over and over again we see that there are politicians committed to fighting for what's right, and there are politicians who aren't. That's it. That's the line. The politicians that sell out to AIPAC are selling out to big tech, to Wall Street, to the military industrial complex, etc.

[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, Obama, who was okay, bombing people in the middle east, many of which were innocent, doesn't care about the, innocent people, in the US.

If they care, they should be in the front line protesting the shit show of the ICE. They are the one that cannot be touch by Trump and his government. He is the one who doesn't fear losing his life nor does he fear losing his income.

These people are out of touch, they hope Trump do as much damage so they can get voted in without the need to listen to their voters.

It is like a divorce kid, where both parents are abuser. One of which doesn't abuse you as much as knows that the other is worst.

People and Unions should break this abusive cycle.

[-] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

All this astrofurfing and campaigning for Newsom is just a proactive effort to preempt any radical voices from gaining traction from the anti-Trump momentum. That’s the top of their agenda right now, institutional integrity and democracy is at best second.

[-] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago

this has little to do with campaigning for newsom… it’s about supporting the counter to republican gerrymandering

you might be right in general, but this is not that context

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is a great example of "the left" being manipulated to turn on itself. Newsom ain't great but he is better than anything my former party Republicans put forth. If he makes it through the primaries, please for the love of Satan vote for him in the general. If Republicans win again it's completely over. If I were still one I'd be completely OK with so many worse things happening. Be more scared of what is yet to come than a groveling centrist like Newsom.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

Newsom, the Zionist guy who likes destroying homeless people's encampements for PR ain't "great". That's quite an understatement.

[-] EldenLord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You both can be right with these seemingly opposed stances. Doesn‘t matter actually, all that matters is that the left is divided and the right isn‘t. That‘s all it takes for evil to win.

Change that!

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This is my point reiterated. I don't like newsom either, but i would vote for him 1x10^100 if he were the candidate in the general. The "he is being normalized" shit is why the left loses all the time. Complain about him, but don't assume enough centrists wont vote for him in the primaries for him to be the general candidate. I'm tired of people not voting, then bitching about the current administration.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] zenitsu@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

As if any candidate you would consider radical would have any chance in hell of winning

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I’ve been watching republicans do illegal things my entire life. Nobody has ever stopped them

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Some judges have.

Some people like the ACLU and Marc Elias have.

Etc.

Stopped all illegal things they do? No. But many real people have stopped many real things.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe they slowed them down but this decent into facism didn’t happen overnight

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago
[-] Glifted@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Lets not forget Obama (in-part) paved the way for the shit we're in now

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

So they're finally acknowledging it.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

They are actively shaping the electoral environment. They don't just want to, they are actively preparing to do so.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Project Red Map was never a secret.

[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

As far as I can tell, Newsom is just a 'fascist, but not too obvious, so people won't protest' kind of candidate. A perfect pick if you want to salvage what remains of the empire and delay its inevitable collapse. But then again, it's not like Americans have any reasonable candidates. And we're also going on the assumption that there will be another election, so let's not get ahead of ourselves.

Would he be an improvement for the American people? And for other countries? At the very least, minorities in the USA would be [mostly] safe for a few years.

[-] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He’s just your stereotypical neoliberal corporate Democrat which is a much better alternative to Trump’s admin. I don’t like Newsom like most on here, but if he gets the nomination still show the fuck up.

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He's a capitalist. Fascist I don't think so. We have to stop purity testing left candidates, it's a trap. So what if he doesn't have every opinion we have - he's more in touch with the average voter on those issues, frankly. We need to start thinking like we want to win, not like we want to be right.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 1 month ago

Leftists in USA do need to band together, and I feel like it is more difficult to do so because of our individually. Most of our goals are common.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
113 points (99.1% liked)

politics

26640 readers
873 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS