135
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

knowledge is so sexy[

[-] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] TehBamski@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Just the tips, eh?

[-] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

per 1 million views

What is the average view count on something like this... do they commonly reach multi-million view counts?

Edit: Yes, I'm an old man.

[-] jim_v@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Her PornHub has 2,594,161 views right now.

Edit: 2,594,162

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hence articles like this bother me:

https://www.axios.com/2025/12/13/joy-reid-leaving-corporate-media

YouTube, Instagram and TikTok…

That’s the trap. These mega platforms feel like “liberating” creative outlets, but they take basically all the ad revenue and hand out scraps; the absolute bare minimum to keep creators around. And that ratio shrinks as the monopoly grows.

Yet creators, even journalists trained to sniff out profiteering, go in blind to that.


And yes, I get it. “Just don’t use them,” is much harder said than done.

…But they could be a little more critical of their platform, like this lady.

[-] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 1 points 4 months ago

It's just hype. They parade around people that "made it" with their revenue programs. The 99 or so % that never make any, or even lose, money in the process are never shown.
A close friend of mine invested a 4-figure amount into travels, gadgets and all sorts of stuff to show off... while being unemployed. Had a huge, organic crowd of followers, too, on several platforms. Tried everything, but never saw a single cent in return.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah.

Hence most that "make it" do it through external links, like sponsors, OnlyFans, merch, blog/newsletter subscriptions and such.

Yet the platforms are trying to squash that. Just the other day, I witnessed the official YouTube Android TV app skip a video's sponsor.

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 0 points 4 months ago

Where then? What’s free with a shot at getting views/revenue?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's what I'm saying.

You have to use YouTube, Tiktok, whatever. But at least be a little more self aware and vocal of the platform's pitfalls.

And to be clear, some content creators already are. But it needs to be the majority. They need to remind every single viewer "this place is a trap, a bloodsucking leech, and we're here because we have no choice." Just subtly enough to avoid deranking, of course.

[-] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

They are liberating creative outlets in the sense that they offer a platform and tools for creative expression (barring some ToS rules) for free. You can post a creative video that may be seen by thousands without needing to sell ownership to some company. They play ads to pay for its associated costs and yes, to turn a profit, while giving a small portion to the creators as an additional incentive. But they are not intended to replace regular income in a meaningful way. I have never heard of anyone suggesting that trying to do so is a good idea, including the big name content creators that by exception do manage to earn a living from it.

If you think it should be a reliable way to make money, I would say you have the unfair expectation for it. I would compare it to complaining that a service that teaches you how to knit is only sufficient for hobbyists and rarely allows one to build a successful company selling clothes. That's just beyond the scope of what it's there for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You gotta get a million views to earn a thousand bucks?!

[-] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

A $1 CPM (per thousand impressions) is actually pretty good for a platform like Pornhub where I assume most people are logged out/incognito etc. on an adult content.

If YouTube is really only paying out $0.34 CPM to that creator, that is atrocious. They must be getting like 20% rev share.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Shroomshroom@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 months ago

Dunno if my math is wrong, but i think she made more money from youtube than pornhub. So for this particular case youtube is still better besides the low cpm. So im not sure where we going with that. PH ca. 33$ and YT ca. 340$

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Are there any video essays on PornHub? Bonus if they're actual port with actual information.

[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm just imagining a world where YouTube is so shit and pays so poorly that most content creators move to pornhub, and it becomes a respectable place to go to learn stuff and watch video essays, more than porn

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
135 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

11379 readers
248 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS