123

Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

-_-

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Mozilla has had decades to find a sustainable business structure that aligns with the values of its contributors and users, yet here we are...

load more comments (1 replies)

Any valid alternative for android phones to firefox with same add-on support? These idiots look like they are speedrunning it to become a shitty company.

[-] quaff@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ive been wary if firefox since wheneved it was they decided it was okay to shove "pocket" into the browser. These days i dont see mozilla as anything other than anti monopoly insurance for google, which they obviously dont need anymore.

Mozilla as a company has just been a decade of one poor decision after another adding more bloat and doing nothing meaningful to counter chromes near monopoly.

Vivaldi isnt perfect and brave has its baggage, but at least they actually include adblocking out of the box, a feature that just about everyone wants. Sure its easy enough to install an addon to firefox for it but the fact that you even have to do that should tell you everything you need to know about who mozilla is actually working for.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Their user base is almost exclusively tech savvy people, the same people who are most opposed to AI.

I think this move signals that they believe we have nowhere else to go, and they're daring us to go fuck ourselves, because fuck you, what are you going to do, use Chrome?

Yes, yes I will, well Chromium forks.

In general, I prefer the look and feel of chromium-based browsers, but I use Firefox and Firefox forks for the reasons that I'm sure everyone here is aware of.

If those reasons go away, I'll just switch to Vivaldi as my primary browser. I won't be happy about it, but if Firefox becomes another AI slop project. I might as well go with the browser whose UX I prefer.

[-] VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu 4 points 4 months ago

Just like everything in North America it's about aquisition not retention.

[-] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 2 points 4 months ago

I did exactly this a while back. And as a self protection mechanism I've just completely written off Mozilla products as free falling in the enshittification process. I don't care enough to be disappointed any more, it's much nicer this way.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 4 months ago

Vivaldi is like the only tech company in the world that has come out and stated definitively "we will not use AI".

load more comments (37 replies)
[-] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm going to have to go Amish at this rate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

I was having issues with Librewolf on a work computer a few weeks ago, so I decided to try Firefox to see if it was LW's security settings.

Holy shit, what a fucking trainwreck Firefox has become! It's so bad that I can't honestly recommend anyone use it anymore. The first time I started it, I saw all kinds of ads and trashy "news" articles that had no relevance to me whatsoever. Plus I had to reinstall all my extensions because they weren't signed and there's no way to disable that requirement. I was so horrified and offended, I just dumped it immediately and tried Chrome instead. What difference is there at this point?

It's just insulting at this point. I understand that they trying to find new revenue sources, and things are still better today than they were with Mitchell Baker as CEO, but it's still horrific how poorly Mozilla is being run. I'm so grateful we still have usable forks from the amazing people running projects like Librewolf. Without them, the web would just be flat out unusable.

[-] FluidBeef@quokk.au 4 points 4 months ago

Is it possible for the major forks to just go their own way, or is it more complicated than that? Obviously anyone building a new browser engine from the ground up now with complete HTML, CSS and JavaScript spec is so immense an undertaking as to sound far-fetched, so the open source community would need to leverage whatever it can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

waterfox, pale moon, ironfox. there's your multiple models.

[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Mozilla is completely detached from its user base. They think their average user is a Microsoft enthusiast when in reality it's a Debian enjoyer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

And here ... we ... go

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

At some point there'll be enough pressure for a large enough fork of Firefox and Thunderbird to exist separately from Mozilla. Keep pushing, random clueless CEO.

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Some of Mozilla's AI integrations have been amazing, despite the community crying about it. Like private, offline translation (I don't care what anybody says, this is much better than sending the contents of your web page to a proprietary Google Translate server), and enhanced screen reader functionality.

But this one puzzles me. They're not being very descriptive, but it seems like it's just integrating generic LLM stuff? Not really what I'm after personally. At least it's opt-in, I guess.

[-] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Gaaaaaaaahhhhh, please make it stop!

[-] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
123 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84255 readers
298 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS