If you're forced to rent because you can't get on the housing ladder, you should be allowed to have an animal as a pet. Full stop. That's the sentence.

If the landlord doesn't like that it may affect their investment, well... sometimes investments go bad. Might I suggest selling the house and investing in a market that isn't built around the exploitation of regular people trying to not die on the street.

Just sayin'.

This will be of limited value if they don't also address leasehold restrictions on pets. "No pets" is written into my landlord's lease (and every leasehold contract I've ever seen) so they can't allow us to have a pet even if they wanted to.

Surely it should be a case of "do what you want in your flat as long as you don't cause damage"? What's the issue? Landlords are such fannies.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

The new bill “requires landlords not to unreasonably withhold consent”, leaving a new ombudsman for private renting, and ultimately the courts, to decide what is reasonable – creating a new grey area in landlord-tenant relations.

“If they want to have a pack of Great Danes live there, that should be their right, but they will also be liable for costs if the dogs tear the place up,” said Tom Darling, the coalition’s campaign manager.

The bill will also ask courts to rule on cases of antisocial behaviour, as the government plans to give landlords stronger powers to turf out badly behaved tenants.

The same survey showed a majority of the public supports ending no-fault evictions and banning inflation-busting rent rises, and renters are due to protest outside parliament on Monday, warning MPs: “Vote down popular rental reforms at your peril.”

Angela Rayner, the shadow housing secretary, said tenants have been “left paying a heavy price for the government’s inaction with tens of thousands threatened with homelessness and receiving visits from the bailiffs”.

“Labour welcomes the long-awaited second reading of the renters reform bill, but we will look to strengthen it to ensure it meets the scale of the housing crisis this Conservative government has created,” she added.

The original article contains 846 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

It's a tricky one in flats where you are literally living on top of each other, as you not only have the issue of noise and, potentially, mess but I know at least one person who had to move because someone in another flat got a dog and they are terrified of them (and another person was in the same boat but didn't have the option of moving).

Landlords can currently deny tenants who want pets, and some have charged “pet rent”.

Well, it does bring extra issues for the landlord, so I suppose that having a pet fee is reasonable, but it sounds like there's a fair argument that the demand is undersupplied today.

This is for the US, but I wouldn't be surprised if numbers hold.

https://www.tenantcloud.com/blog/pets-in-rental-properties-a-guide-for-landlords-and-tenants

After surveying 1,000 tenants, it was found that approximately 90% of renters have pets. On the other hand, around 69% of landlords do not allow pets in their rental properties due to concerns about potential pet-related issues such as odor, property damage, lack of training, noise complaints, and the property's suitability for pets. In a competitive rental market, landlords may choose not to risk losing potential tenants who don't have pets. One solution to this issue could be for renters with pets to pay an increased deposit to cover possible damages. However, around 88% of pet owners have never had any complaints or caused any damage to rental properties.

Let's take a closer look at some of the pros and cons of renting to pet owners to better understand the implications of such a decision.

Pros:

1. Increased Demand: Allowing pets in your rental property can open up your pool of potential tenants, as many pet owners struggle to find pet-friendly housing.

2. Higher Rent: Pet owners are often willing to pay a higher rent or a pet deposit, which can increase your rental income.

3. Longer Tenancy: Pet owners tend to be more settled and stay in one place for longer periods, which can reduce tenant turnover and vacancy rates.

4. Responsible Tenants: Pet owners are often trustworthy and caring and most likely will treat your property with respect and care.

5. Emotional Support: For some tenants, having a pet can be a source of emotional support and can aid mental health issues.

Cons:

1. Property Damage: Pets can cause significant damage to a rental property, including scratches, stains, and odors, which can be costly to repair.

2. Noise Complaints: Barking dogs and meowing cats can be a source of disturbance to other tenants and can lead to noise complaints.

3. Liability Issues: If a tenant's pet injures someone or causes damage to someone else's property, you as the landlord may be held liable.

4. Cleaning Costs: Even well-behaved pets can shed hair and dander, which can require additional cleaning and maintenance between tenants.

5. Lease Violations: Some tenants may try to sneak in a pet without your permission, which can lead to lease violations and legal issues.