69
submitted 3 months ago by ByteMe@lemmy.world to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

Is it good? Are there any better alternatives?

(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orenj@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

I prefer it over gmail and outlook, but as others have said, it leaves a bit to be desired

[-] sefra1@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

At some point I used to pay for it (I have a costum domain), but then I ran out of money and couldn't pay. I had the old price too, which was 12 Euros a year.

Now I think the price is the same as proton so if I were to pay for email again, I would probably get proton instead, because proton supports GPG and I think tuta doesn't.

In the end it doesn't matter because 100% of my contacts either use gmail, outlook or some business server and I don't know anyone who uses GPG.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's slow as hell to load and as the other commenter said search is horribly slow. I'm not even exaggerating when I say I spent an hour waiting to load an email from a year or two ago.

[-] Denial@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Love tuta. Esp. the encrypted calendar. some parts Could use some love, but i pay to support that. I used posteo some time ago but found it very annoying in comparision.

[-] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I use them, and recommend them. Full E2EE is my number one requirement - after learning what can be done with just metadata.

Lack of 3rd party clients doesn't bother me.

That they allow integration with your phone's contacts app is a big win - Proton don't allow that.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
69 points (94.8% liked)

Open Source

46513 readers
59 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS