31
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

"These unprecedented tactics -- which even the former top lawyer of the Department of Homeland Security in the first Trump administration has characterized as embarrassing, lawless and cruel -- have now resulted in the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens," the Obamas said.

The Obamas accused the Trump administration of "escalating" the tension in Minneapolis by offering the public explanations of the shootings of Pretti and Renee Good "that aren't informed by any serious investigation -- and that appear to be directly contradicted by video evidence."

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

More moderated words to fight extremism. The obama presidency, ironically, was the fulcrum on which the country continued into extremism by Obama wasting 8 years of energy and time--including 2 years of supermajority in the senate--instead of responding to the increasing threat of the tea party and normalized extremist right wing positions and policy with matching progressive policy delivered. ACA was the only significant accomplishment and it was watered down and written by insurers, which meant it didn't fix affordability so made it easy to demonize as failed.

We kept Guantanamo open, took years to get out of Afghanistan, didn't roll back the fascist surveillance state put into effect by The Patriot Act, didn't move against monopolies, didn't raise the fucking minimum wage...

Obama's moderation with the true chance to set a different course was what helps trump and extremists after that. His naivete is as much to blame as anything for current state.

[-] crank0271@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Don't make him say "unprecedented" again.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"concerning"

"Questionable"

"Debatable"

"Some have described"

The euphemisms for illegal, violent, deadly, thieving, criminal, murderous, bigoted, nepotistic and lying need to stop.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

Plus Russia was helping him, Obama was too much of a pussy to bring it out in the public. I know the establishment democrats use russia as a shield for them sucking, and they do suck, but russia was meddling, to put the worst person in the world in charge, and obama chose not to tell anyone, let alone do anything about it, because the right wing would accuse him of doing what they were openly planning on doing with the justice department.

A sin brought to unbelievable extremes with biden letting a coup go unpunished, letting almost 3 years pass before they indicted anyone, then just the president.

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

That January 6th outcome and no action taken will historically be remembered as Chamberlain attempting to sate Adolf.

[-] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago

He managed to pass Obamacare but I remember there were a great many privacy issues his administration perpetuated or created, and we’re seeing the effect now.

I think he was wishy washy about appointing Supreme Court Justices too?

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Obama had the chance to appoint a SC justice and the right made a huge stink about him doing it in the last few months of his presidency after Trump was set to take over. Instead of doing it and understanding the significance, he/the Dems didn't push and let Trump appoint Cavenough. Meanwhile Trump appointed all kinds of people to no resistance in the waning months of his first term. Curious that, almost like they want it both ways.

[-] baronvonj@piefed.social 1 points 3 months ago

Please cite the legal mechanism that Obama and the Democratic Senate minority had available to them to force the confirmation of Supreme Court a nominee in 2016. Please be aware that Obama did nominate someone for that vacancy. In fact he nominated someone the Republicans themselves name-dropped as a good option. They methodically and purposefully prevented over 100 judicial nominees from receiving a vote, because they held the majority and there was no legal way to get around it.

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

I can support kids killing kids, and adults raping kids, and cops killing people, but it's a real wake up call when this particular cop kills this particular person?

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
31 points (97.0% liked)

News

37348 readers
118 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS