Anyone else find this an odd coincidence. Her husbands PR firm is also referenced in the email files.
I have been thinking the same thing. It seems like it's a reminder to not ask questions and stay in line. It's not the first "reporter" to be threatened or retaliated against for looking into the "wrong" thing.
I think it's as likely it's some crazy guy who thinks he's in a relationship with the daughter. Like delusional.
And went to the moms house to find out where her daughter lived. And things went bad.
wow happy new account day
thanks, still familiarizing myself — but am enjoying the platform thus far.
Honestly, i don't get it. Can you spell out what you mean by it? As someone who sees the morning show throughout the years because my wife will have it on you can clearly tell Savanah is pretty die hard right leaning. It's easily noticeable when she gave interviews you can tell she almost looks angry asking a democrat questions which are considerably harder to answer compared to a Republican. I never liked her from what I saw. With that said I obviously feel bad she has to go through this right now no matter the reason.
I think what the post was insinuating is that it is retaliation for investigating at all.
Or they are afraid of what else could have been said. What's clear is they are afraid of victims doing their own investigations into the perpetrators, especially if they found support from the public, organizations, and found ways around any nda's.
I think Guiffre was murdered and made to look like a suicide. I think she even said she was afraid that would happen. Then a car accident cripples her. Cars can be hacked now, accidents can be caused from the other side of the world, not the least by the epstein conspirators with money and connections and motive.
60 minutes had a new car and paid a hacker to take control of it over the internet in a parking lot, the hacker had the car disobeying their commands. So it's not all academic, why they chose to make cars so someone on he other side of the world can hijack their controls, that's a good question, and I would argue for this very reason, to be able to kill someone they desperately want to kill while making it look like a suicide.
It all sounds paranoid, but with Epstein here, we aren't paranoid enough. Every step of the way we've not been paranoid enough.
Thats why i find it weird. She was on the same side from everything i have seen over the years. I highly doubt she would even be a problem since she also seemed like a fall in line person who would do anything not to rock the boat.
Same side as who?
It's not an R v D thing. It's not even a US specific thing.
I'm not saying there is merit to the theory, but I think you're misunderstanding the story laid out by these releases. The "sides" are the rich and powerful vs everyone else. She's clearly in the "everyone else", camp, regardless of what boots she's licking.
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images