12
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gust@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago

Meh. Negative results are still results, and there's still plenty of ~~well researched sci-fi~~theory that needs to be tested. I could see the field of experimental particle physics shrink or pause until technology catches up to the experiments they want to run, but I can't see it disappearing forever

[-] aburrito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Call me particle physics the way I’m dead dying AND hard

[-] MetalSlugX@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've been saying for a long time this is a sham magazine, and here we are with a sour-toned anti-research push piece for AI. I've had it with this publication.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

I feel packaged libraries make it easy to get the effect, but normal devs no longer know how the underlying models work anymore, and so ganes are starting to look generic.

[-] kybean@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago

Wrong kind of particle physics, this is about the physics of subatomic particles, not video game particle engines

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Upvoted. And thanks for the correction

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
12 points (80.0% liked)

Hacker News

4769 readers
425 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS