59
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

alright, someone explain to me how this actually sucks and we shouldn't get our hopes up.

[-] bonenode@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago

Well, for one this is a study in mice. It is a long way from becoming a commercial product and might not be translatable between mice and humans.

I am a bit skeptical about the allergen protection since in mouse models the mice are "being made" allergenic during the model duration. That is being blocked it seems. If that also means that if you already have the allergy, this new vaccine would block it going forward, hard to say. If one could vaccinate children with this, they may not develop such allergies though, which would be interesting!

[-] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Interesting. Ok, so we're still a decade or so off from this being viable for humans then? And it sounds like it's basically keeping you in a mild state of always having allergies to keep your immune system running on all cylinders, correct? So that might have some long term effects as well?

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

It's like any other drug that activates receptors, the receptors get burned out and the whole signaling pathway gets shut off.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago
  1. It's not a vaccine

  2. It will only work if you expect to catch a virus

  3. Overusing a signaling pathway just turns off receptors

  4. Mouse only.

[-] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Gimme gimme

[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Dont tell RFK. He’ll put it in a poop smoothie and inject it

this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
59 points (95.4% liked)

Hacker News

4795 readers
605 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS