how far away is the US from stoning women in public?
That would be barbaric. Instead, we let them die of sepsis or bleed to death from their genitals.
Or have their body kept artificially alive as an incubator for a fetus.
And find a way to charge the fetus for the hospital bill after delivery.
I believe the grandparents in that scenario are on the hook for the hospital bills for keeping that baby alive. It's so fucked up.
Why do you think they try to keep it alive?
They wouldn't do that. That's a waste of breeding stock after all. She'll simply be tagged and delivered to an incel.
What about trans women?
About trrreee fiddy inches.
Hey look at that, even though everything else about reality is off in 2026, comedic timing is on point.
It might actually be funny if it was all just a joke instead of hypocrisy for the sake of rubbing in what they can get away with. Which is pretty much anything.
Brings to mind a meme I just saw posted a bit ago...
Anti-choice terrorists bombed clinics and murdered healthcare workers and patients, and somehow they still won. Makes you wonder…
Not me. People just don't pay attention.
Since when is it murder for a woman to decide what happens to her own body? This is fucked up
The police investigator obtaining the warrant wrote that Moore told the nursing staff: “I know my infant is suffering, because I am the one who did the abortion. I want her to die.”
That reads like planted testimony, and if it comes to court, it needs to be VERY well stated that it is a 3rd person account, and not a direct admission of guilt.
There’s no guilt to be had no matter what she said. Her body started to create a baby that she didn’t want, so she aborted it. Case closed. There’s nothing wrong with that.
Idiot Senator in 2005: "The body has a way of shutting down unwanted pregnancies"
Society: "WITH THESE PILLS"
Because #science and #freedom
You're equivocating "guilt" as in feeling at fault/remorseful about doing something immoral (the definition you used), with "guilt" as in it being proven that she violated a law (the definition @chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world used).
I meant guilt, as in legally.
Backwater shithole in a shithole country
My first thought was what the hell is going down in Geogia? then I realised this isn't about the nation in the Caucasus, but in the US, so that tracks.
We ought to make conservatism illegal, the way Germany made being a Nazi illegal.
In other news, sales of these devices are stronger than ever.
anti-cock device
er… what is it?
It's for women to wear in their vaginas when they believe sexual assault is unavoidable. It has spines pointing inward that will hook onto a penis to stop the assault and punish the assaulter.
You really didn't want to know... But since you asked, penis goes in, but it doesn't come out.
She should seek asylum in a blue state. I'm serious, put that in play cause this is medieval shit they are trying to do and it should be fought as such.
Ah darn can't make it there before a Flock camera catalogs the car you're riding in and state police immediately intercept you.
By their logic, cancer treatments are murder. It's a collection of human cells developing in your body, independent of the host.
I don't understand these guys, man. Someone else's ability to have an abortion doesn't stop you from not having one. "Pro-choice" doesn't mean "abort all babies." Same way blood transfusions aren't illegal just because some religions forbid it.
They believe a fetus is a “unique person” and no amount of logic or rationality will change their minds. Nothing else matters to their sick, sociopathic minds.
I watched a video today about how MAGA'ts only debate people for publicity. I more like to think they're just too stupid to comprehend anything other than "muh relygion!" Whatever reason, yes, nothing else matters to them.
It was a GeneticallyModifiedSkeptic video, don't remember specifically which one, but it was a great watch imo.
We failed her. That's pretty much it.
Her and others. Once more women see this article they’ll be reluctant to get life-saving treatment which will result in many unnecessary deaths.
Wait, so all it takes is for the police to "say" you took pills? What about a fucking miscarriage? Like this miscarriage of justice?
To get arrested? Yeah. To get prosecuted? Technically no
Up next: Woman suffering from miscarriage charged with manslaughter
Blessed be the fruit
Let us research how far along in the pregnancy this woman was. We can then make an informed decision based on exactly how far along she was when she took these pills, forcing a chemical abortion, then gave birth to a living baby that died. Have you googled the number of weeks yet? Spoiler: Its over have the term.
It doesn’t matter.
It doesnt matter that she tried to abort a 5 month pregnancy? Really?
What if she tried to abort a 15 month pregnancy?
Im pro-choice myself, but her actions were ... wrong.
Why stop at 15 months? What about if mom aborts her 455 month old man-child Ted Brogan?
No it doesn’t matter.
There’s no such thing as a 15 month pregnancy.
It doesn’t matter. A woman shouldn’t be forced to use her body against her will. Period. The end.
A 15 month pregnancy would be a 6 month old child. Watch more South Park.
"Aborting" a pregnancy that is over half term is wrong.
False equivalency.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.