11
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Do we have a time machine? No? Then we can't make a better choice for primary than him anymore. That's it.

Is he better than Susan Collins?

That's the vote. A or B. Decide which, between those two options only you'd hate the least, and vote the vote.

Is he imperfect? Yes. But now he's only competing against Ms Collins.

[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Well that’s fucking depressing

Everything else is much more depressing.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And if turns into another Fetterman? Then what?

[-] protist@retrofed.com -1 points 1 week ago

Fettermsn had a stroke that obviously changed his personality

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No I heard he was always an asshole. But it was him or OZ and sick of the lesser evil which is bullshit. And this guy is a nazi. His bullshit he didn't know his tattoo was what it wss goes against realty. So guess we see how he turns out. I hope for the best but not holding out he will make any difference.

[-] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not so sure about that, given some questionable past behavior of his. His entire time as a mayor was problematic.

[-] gointhefridge@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

He says enough good things that he’s worth throwing some weight behind. Importantly too, (and unfortunate it has to be this way) he’s a macho white veteran. He’s speaking TOO and FOR this demographic who happens to have too much weight in the US political discourse.

A lot of what he says I generally agree with, but he is, like any politician, imperfect. He’s the best we got against Susan Collins though. If his image can be the voice of reason to this demographic of desperately macho white dudes in the US, then let’s ride the wave until someone better comes along.

[-] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Genuinely hope I'm wrong about him, but it's frustrating that Maine couldn't find a candidate without a Nazi tattoo. Or one that doesn't go on Nazi podcasts and call themselves long time fans. Or one that didn't enlist in a war they thought was wrong because they wanted to kill people. Or one that didn't merc for Blackwater.

I get that one can't pick their family, but his blue blood parents trying to buy him a mayorship is also wild.

[-] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Eh he's a white guy. Doesn't matter what his past is, he gets to apologize and move on. Not like they have other examples of populist leftists in multiple other elections across the country. No, it's this white ex-mercenary who had to remove a totenkopf tattoo.

No this guy is the face of populism...

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sad to think that the economy has gotten so bad that his parents who both worked normal ass professional jobs are considered blue bloods now. Back in my day we called that middle class.

Interesting how many billionaires are pouring cash into spreading any and all kinds of bullshit about this guy. The more they spend the better I feel about him.

[-] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

Have you considered making a donation to Susan Collins?

[-] soratoyuki@piefed.zip -2 points 1 week ago

Don't be MAGA-brained. Politicians with a D after their name can still be criticized.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

Don't try to reason with blue maga

[-] CobraCommander@quokk.au -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nazis are the new US populism?

[-] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Which of his policies are Nazi policies?

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

He doesn't have any policies. He's a candidate for a low level elected office where he will be exactly 1% of the vote and he will absolutely vote to continue expanding the military and the police. He saw what happened and instead of becoming a conscientious objector he decided to voluntarily join Blackwater!

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you actually dig into it, like me, he was clueless that a skull and crossbones was a Nazi symbol. It was the first thing I looked up on him, then just stared trying to sort it out because it didn’t look like any Nazi symbology I’d ever seen.

Good odds this a big money rumor to keep people like this guy off ballots.

He’s essentially working class. Liberal gun owner. Calling for retirement of the old guard. Better to look up what the man has said re Schumer and such.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I've said it before, but if his reddit post history is any indication, if he's a Nazi plant he's playing the really long game. Not that he hasn't posted stupid shit, but the worst of it was posted long ago and it's fair to account for personal growth.

I don't think he is the best progressive candidate possible but he probably isn't a Nazi. Just kind of ignorant.

[-] gdog05@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My best friend was military. Raised Mormon, though he spent a decent amount of time in boys homes (very crazy mom) and went into the military as quickly as he could. Very typical meathead character, doing basic toxic male shit. He was working for the military when I met him. And I met him because he was leaving his faith when he learned about atheism. Since then, he became a pacifist (I helped him through his conscientious objector status to get out of the military), got rid of his guns, became a staunch Democrat, recognized his suppressed bisexuality, and started working on his mental health. If you put the person I first met, next to the person he is today, he's only visually the same. Completely different person. It's not normal to have such extreme changes. Most of us don't have those polar changes in life. But some people do. Platner sounds a lot like my friend. He has been angry for a while but finally put on the They Live glasses and figured out who and what to be angry at. Could it all be a farce? Yeah. We could be being misled. Any politician can be someone else. Platner's story thus far is absolutely plausible. And it's been scrutinized heavily. He's not a George Santos. He IS however targeted by Israel and the oligarchs. So, I'm choosing to believe his story, one that I've seen before, over targeted talking points that are being used in paid ads by AIPAC.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

It's not about being misled. The guy has very clearly not done the work. Sure. He looks like he's starting to do the work, but he's a massive fucking liability with the half apologies and the backtracking. He's not woke yet. Yes, everyone has a right to start where there are. No, we don't have to fucking vote them into positions of power over us.

[-] soratoyuki@piefed.zip -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not knowing what it is is an obvious lie, sorry. There's no way the white male millennial soldier that grew up with the History Channel didn't know what it was. His friends and family have said he knew what it was. He had Reddit posts defending police getting SS bolts and discussing the thematic differences between Totenkopf and Punisher tattoos.

And, honestly, if he genuinely didn't know what it was, that level of historical ignorance should also be disqualifying.

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So if the argument is that he is, still, currently a Nazi, just running on progressive ideology to pull one over on all of us dumb rubes, why bother hiding it? Why be a cryptofascist when obvious-as-fuck fascists are running on fascist platforms and getting elected because they're fascists? He has said literally nothing even in his online posts as a private citizen anywhere near as far-reich or as blatant as the current admin says in plain sight on Twitter.

[-] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Idk and I'm gen x,different state, but seriously did i fuckin idiots really elect another fetterman? Quit bein gullible, and curb stop a Republican

[-] architect@thelemmy.club -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know they fucking did, man, and they are going to witch hunt US for calling their dumb asses out.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 week ago

He also didn't know what sexting was, eh? Just said some words that his buddies thought sounded cool and next thing you know his wife is sharing them to expose what he's actually like?

[-] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

If he's a Nazi, why isn't he running as a Republican like all the others? If he's a fellow Nazi, why are all the other Nazis so intent and focused on attacking him. Rather than amplifying him and getting him elected?

I'm not going to make the claim that plattner isn't a meathead/jarhead that has said some pretty stupid shit over the years. Facts are facts. And none of that is disqualifying in light of his competition. A sad critique of our country's politics in general. Plattner isn't going to fix everything, or likely even anything. He will probably struggle to be average or even adequate. But is that he wasn't the establishment Democrats conservative pic, or the Republicans conservative incumbent old coat hanger he's learned his lesson Collins.

If you actually go look into the guy. You'll find out that while he's not ideal. He's definitely no Nazi, and definitely not another fetterman.

[-] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Do you really believe only the Republicans are Nazis? Operation Paperclip was done under Truman. The genocidal campaign against North Korea was also Truman. LBJ lead the mass murder campaign in Vietnam and Laos.

No. The fact that Platner is the darling of the Ds is shifting the Overton Window of acceptable open proximity to Nazis, not proof that Platner isn't as horrible as his history shows him to be. The man chose to join Blackwater AFTER he saw what they were doing in theater.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
11 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29978 readers
1099 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS