74

Nevermind that colosus 2 of xAI was supposed to serve Grok, or expected (paying $60b for) Cursor composer models, and they are renting out capacity instead of using it...

Google has massive out clauses for following through on this BS deal. They are slightly overpaying, but in off chance that GB200 rental market is strong in 2027, they have the option of following through if they can resell capacity, though have full cancellation rights.

Google can dump 100% of their SpaceX shares prior to cancellation date. They also have 63% gradual dump rights ahead of most other locked up SpaceX investors.

SpaceX merger with xAI was based on lie of economic viability of space datacenters and terrafab, and IPO expands on the fraud, with so much of financial industry invested in the fraud.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

I guess commas, can be hard to place, correctly.

[-] catdog@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

What's withholding SpaceX from selling more stock with an even shorter time until they can be dumped? Sounds like a pyramid scheme.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

There are signs that IPO is too big for market. 30% retail, and $135/share fixed price are because demand is not present. The illegal private/SPV market is trading below $129, where SPV entity that was not a fraud about to go bankrupt, and confident in the IPO would buy back shares up to close to $135.

This BS by google is desperation to pump their existing stake. Anthropic's headline $1.25B/month deal is also a fraud. Big discounts until after the IPO, and same cancellation rights.

xAI got a made up (no one putting cash in) $250B valuation in its merger. Including Twitter it has barely any revenue, and without having to rent gpu datacenter space, was still losing $10b/year for a not particularly competitive Grok model.

What’s withholding SpaceX from selling more stock with an even shorter time until they can be dumped?

97% of the stock is already issued. 3% goes to new IPO bagholders, shortly later, passive index forced buying from the 3% market. The 97% are the ones with accelerated dump rights, that kick in a percentage shortly after fraudulent accelerated index inclusion date.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

Is the bubble close to popping? What are these bullshit deals?

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago

The need for more GPUs/datacenters was based on xAI using them for their own models, instead of competing with new datacenters/GPUs in the rental market. GPU rental prices went down to below cost levels for H series after Anthropic deal. It has bounced back this last week, but rates are still in the "very well supplied" range. On demand rates half of Anthropic/Google rental deals. GPU rental rates are the best measure of AI bubble point. Concerted fraud is still possible to provide the illusion of "this is fine". The google deal only starts in September, while Anthropic got some free GPU time when deal was announced.

In a way, pumping more money into AI (through IPO) delays the bubble pop, even if NVidia doesn't sell as many GPUs if their customers add them to rental market. Bubble can pop from 3 directions. Less GPUs/TPUs sold than forecast; datacenter overcapacity ; understanding poor economics/tokenomics of high competition LLM labs.

The sad part is that the more money invested, the greater the funding for the fraud, and longer lasting fraud.

[-] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Do you pronounce it "Ecks Ayy I" or "Zai" now?

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

42682 readers
163 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS