316
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A federal jury in Louisiana on Wednesday acquitted a white state trooper charged with violating the civil rights of a Black motorist despite body-camera footage that showed the officer pummeling the man 18 times with a flashlight.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] style99@kbin.social 95 points 1 year ago

Brown still faces state charges in the violent arrest of yet another Black motorist, a case in which he boasted in a group chat with other troopers that “it warms my heart knowing we could educate that young man.”

To be continued...

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

I am assuming this guy still has a job... jfc

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 year ago

Resigned in 2021. Its in the article.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Must be nice being able to do that

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

how to get away with murder. become a cop, commit the crime and resign with a pension.

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

After a three-day trial in Monroe, jurors found Brown not guilty of depriving Aaron Bowman of his civil rights during a 2019 beating that left Bowman with a broken jaw, broken ribs and a gash to his head.

The acquittal comes as federal prosecutors are still scrutinizing other Louisiana state troopers caught on body-camera video punching, stunning and dragging another Black motorist, Ronald Greene, before he died in their custody on a rural roadside. That federal probe is also examining whether police brass obstructed justice to protect the troopers who beat Greene following a high-speed chase.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 year ago

Let me guess the jury was made up of a mostly white male jury?

Exactly how did he get aquiitted. These fucking states are si fucking racist you can't get a fair trail there unless your white.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

His dad is a known racist.

Bob Brown, the former chief of staff, was disciplined for displaying a Confederate flag in his office and admitted the n-word was part of his vocabulary.

https://www.wbrz.com/news/nakamoto-racist-behavior-under-investigation-at-state-police-internal-documents-show-it-dates-back-decades/

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly I can't find a single news article that discusses likely jury bias. In fact, most articles are just carbon copies of each other

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They probably expected to lose this one only to appeal immediately and hope appeals knows their ass from their elbow.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

I doubt it, since prosecutors generally cannot appeal a verdict of not guilty.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean the citizen, you assume the crooked local court is going to do crooked local court shit.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

The citizen can't appeal either. Prosecutors are in charge of a criminal case, not citizens.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is no prosecutor in civil court.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This wasn't a civil case. This was a criminal case. Depriving someone of their civil rights is a federal crime. The officer was prosecuted by Brandon Brown.

U.S. Attorney Brandon Brown, who is not related to Jacob Brown, told AP he was proud of the 48-year-old Bowman for having the courage to tell his story.

“These cases are arguably the toughest that we investigate and prosecute,” he said. “We believe that this victim’s civil rights were violated. Unfortunately for us the jury didn’t agree, and we’ll have to respect their decision.”

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You take the officer to civil court, win, take that win and use it for a public interest appeal, win be vindicated. The prosecutor doesn't take part in the next step homie.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Let me guess the jury was made up of a mostly white male jury?

Here comes the story of the Hurricane.

[-] dartos@reddthat.com -5 points 1 year ago

The lawyers on both sides have influence on who gets into the jury. If the jury had such an overwhelming bias, then the lawyers are to blame…. As always

[-] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The lawyers don't pick who is in the jury pool.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Do you want vigilante justice?

This is how you get vigilante justice.

[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

I wonder how many people will act surprised when the next protests will end up even more violent.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

God i hate Louisiana. Just a resource colony with the resource curse, sports, and parades...

[-] sci@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

Aren't juries great

[-] girlfreddy@mastodon.social 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
316 points (99.1% liked)

News

23376 readers
2943 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS