606
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Bought a car with a future subscription to its remote services (climate, lock/unlock, etc). Company wants $450/year for access. Guess what we aren’t going to sign up for when the free 2 year period expires?

Vote with the wallets folks.

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

Same thing for me with 5g hotspot in my new car. They said "hey that's free for 6 months, along with enhanced onstar", and I replied keep it, I don't fucking want it.

They looked at me like I was growing a second head. They said they didn't know how to deactivate it, as nobody had asked that before. My ass. They knew better than to ask for a credit card number to activate the service, at least.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] FeetinMashedPotatoes@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Only the stupid rich people who are complete fucking idiots are gonna spend money on this. That and people irresponsible with money who are also complete morons. Anyone with a sense of financial responsibility will absolutely not buy these shitty anti consumer cars

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Sure, and like with everything else the free market is controlled mostly by broke morons and rich assholes. So it'll happen anyways because those two groups will fall for it, believing they're entitled to nice things.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

And what happens when you don't have other options in the market?

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'll keep driving my old car that has no wireless connectivity.

I could also buy an old 1969 Ford Galaxie and have it fitted with an electric motor and a trunk full of batteries to build my own electric car. We can do that with any old car actually.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

🎶 It's a bad idea, and they're all about it 🎶

[-] grimacefry@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago

I worked in design for a major global automaker, I designed and prototyped various user experiences around enabling/disabling features on demand, and paying a subscription. This was 7-8 years ago, and the context was developing countries and what we called "emerging markets" where people just bought bare bones base model vehicles, but there were always 1 or 2 highly desirable features they needed but could only get in a high spec model - they couldn't afford.

The idea tested very well, they could buy their cheap vehicle and then enable just the things they really need. And they would pay for that. I still think this is a valid and good use case for subscribing, in these markets and for these people.

Somewhere between then and today, sales and marketing entered the chat, and I know because I fought them tooth and nail. What I designed morphed into subscribing to everything for everyone. I don't work there any more and that's part of why.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
606 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58872 readers
4008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS