162
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 43 points 10 months ago

It really sounds like this was an error by one citizenship officer and it will get reversed.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

That's how it seems to me but I would have figured an error such as that would be resolved by higher ups before it turns into world news.

[-] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 26 points 10 months ago

She was smart going to the press. The official complaint red tape could potentially drag beyond her deportation.

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

I think she probably had to declare previous convictions on her citizenship application and one in a category of treason (as classified by Russia) would result in an automatic "computer says no" until appealed and viewed by a human.

If, say, an Australian was applying for Canadian citizenship and declared the same offence in Australia the negative outcome would be less likely to be overturned.

[-] MightBe@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Please update your submission title to reflect a potential change in the article title, as current rule does ask that they match.

[-] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago
[-] MightBe@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] intelshill@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Canadian immigration has been increasingly trigger-happy recently.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Russian anti-war activist is facing the prospect of deportation from Canada after her citizenship application was blocked on the grounds that her blogposts had broken Moscow’s harsh laws criminalizing criticism of the invasion of Ukraine.

The decision, first reported by the CBC, which has baffled immigration lawyers, faults Maria Kartasheva over criminal charges leveled by Russian prosecutors, even though her dissent mirrors Canada’s foreign policy.

Kartasheva, founder of the Russian Canadian democratic alliance, fled her homeland in 2019 amid concern over Vladimir Putin’s growing crackdown on dissent .

Justin Trudeau’s government has been deeply critical of the Russian state, sanctioning many officials – including the judge who oversaw Kartasheva’s arrest in absentia.

In December, Canadian officials told her in a letter that her conviction in Russia aligns with a criminal code offence relating to spreading false information.

Another expert, the University of Toronto law professor Audrey Macklin, said the case appeared the result of an “over-zealous” citizenship officer and questioned the decision to pull her during the ceremony.


The original article contains 830 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 80%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Canada safe haven for Nazis and separatists but not for anti-dictator activists or bloggers.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago
  1. It was re-examined and corrected
  2. The plural of 'anecdote' isn't 'data'
  3. "Canada safe haven" seems to a word short of a sentence and I don't want to seem overly optimistic in thinking you're better than at least that.
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
162 points (94.5% liked)

World News

39013 readers
886 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS