417
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lt_Worf@lemmy.ca 167 points 1 year ago

I think this is an example of what people say in surveys being drastically different than what they'll do in reality.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago

Today's phrase is "garnish your wages." If their protest doesn't involve moving to another country it's not going to happen. I've thought about it too, but my contingency,for that definitely involves moving to Scandinavia.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah bullshit. Civil rights weren't achieved by threatening to leave and not be the oppressor's problem anymore, they were achieved by standing ones ground damned the consequences. No one wants to be a martyr, but that's how battles are unfortunately won, especially against today's brand of fascists.

[-] ineedaunion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

More of this. It's time for mass protests instead of complaining and then working a 9 to 5 and browsing Instagram.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The US government: let's enable the economy to get to the point where it's basically impossible for young people to even participate in society.

Also the US government: damn, why do people keep going on suicidal mass shootings? If only there was anything we could do about it.

[-] ineedaunion@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DietBajaBlast@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Exactly, they’d be ruining their credit scores.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 71 points 1 year ago

Is it really a boycott if you simply can't make the payments?

Not that I mind.

[-] Fraylor@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just confused as to why it's all fine and dandy that PPP loans were all forgiven regardless of the corrupt practices used for disbursement, but student loans, which impact the economy as a whole far more than PPP ever will, is a must repay.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago

A lot of wealthy people benefited from PPP loans including House and Senate members, that's why.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Because Republicans will fight so that the rich can get richer by getting handed free money, and Republican will fight so that the working class has to pay back every cent.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't our wages just get garnished or shit repo'd or something? I'm 100% for forgiveness cuz fuck that predatory shit, but this route seems like a guarantee to just exacerbate harm to the borrowers.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

Nothing will be repoed. They may garnish your wages but at the end of the day, there is no collateral.

[-] cbarrick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Garnished wages is still a huge problem.

Student loans are not forgiven in bankruptcy.

The federal government will garnish borrowers wages until they are paid, even if the borrower is bankrupt.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

They look at your wages and expenses. I knew a dentist who got garnished 10 dollars a month. That’s all he could afford.

You can’t take blood from a turnip

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] siph@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

I've been boycotting mine for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"And with enough evaders,

Escaping from the game,

The rule becomes an empty shell

That rules in only name..."

  • Leslie Fish, "Zero Game"
[-] Confused_Emus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm considering not paying as long as they're doing the "ease you back into it" stuff like not reporting to credit agencies or garnishing wages. Seems essentially like a forbearance without the interest freeze. It really just depends on what my new payments end up being. But until that dog gets its teeth back, Nelnet can have what's left after I pay my actual bills and buy my weed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Boycotting only works when there is a noticeable financial hit to the producer. The federal government is not going to notice this. This can be good for campaigning though. Tell people that the reason they are not getting some forgiveness is because Republicans are doing everything they can to block it. Send out some flyers to everyone who has a federal student loan with a list of every Republican official who has had a PPP loan forgiven.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Let's get those numbers up, I'm not paying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] unaredon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Not from America so please someone explain to me, I read Biden wanted to forgive student loans but somehow it didn't get through. Sure it would be much better if the loan is forgiven, but now it is not, shouldn't you still pay back what is owned? They really think they can just not pay and expect no consequences?

[-] Sl00k@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These loans are out right predatory. I was offered a 12% interest rate 7 years ago and have friends who've been offered 16%!!!

Yes you can say just don't sign it, but we're 17 years old we can't comprehend how much affect a 16% interest rate will have on you in 8 years and you've been told all your life college is the goto life path and you have to do this to get a "good job" and live a good life.

I agree we should payback the money we loaned, but taking advantage of genz via predatory loans for wanting a higher education is downright criminal in itself.

Adding onto this a lot of us will struggle to make these payments. I have 20k in loans and I haven't paid a dime on EVER. Now I suddenly have a second car payment out of nowhere!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] doggle@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Of course everyone involved knows they will face consequences, but they may feel those consequences are better than the payments. Courts can't garnish paychecks that don't exist and a ruined credit rating only matters if you were ever going to be able to afford to buy a house or car in the first place. Afaik actual jail time isn't really a thing for defaulting on a loan. If the only leverage the government has to get people to pay the loan is to threaten their future financial security, then anyone who thinks the initial promises of security is bogus has nothing to lose.

There's also some people who are willing to take the hit just to send a political message.

That said, I suspect nowhere near 62% of borrowers will actually meaningfully boycott in any way.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

Debtor's prisons are actually unconstitutional so they could never jail you for refusing to pay any loan.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a good way to have your wages garnished.

[-] drewdarko@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

So don’t pay and make them work for it.

With the labor shortage right now it would be expensive for loan collectors to hire enough workers to track down and force payments if people stop paying on a large scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Only for government-issued loans, I believe. Private loans won't go into auto-garnishing unless you agree to it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
417 points (94.8% liked)

News

23301 readers
1148 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS