263
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by suspicious_eye@lemmy.world to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 9 months ago

Not the ones with numbered accounts that accept crypto...

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Nothing says legit like taking anonymous money.

[-] Cinner@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

This but unironically. Accepts monero and cash? Worth a look.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 months ago

Of course, besides the people who fall for the basic "VPN are some magic security device" most people (in particular those that know what they're getting) always looks for the same thing "which one can I actually trust".

Even if it's not government owned you have no idea whose keeping logs, sharing data etc.

So you can really only base your trust on whether the company has come up to any issues with the government and have refused, or has run for a number of years and provide a positive track record. With the changing of laws and how companies work, you also need to regularly check that your they stay respecting privacy and security.

For what it's worth, a VPN company worth is if it private, security and stands up to scrutiny. The moment trust is lost, the company is meaningless. So that's something for those that are long lasting.

[-] terry_tibbs@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah but would they show their hand by coming down heavy on the average pirate or petty law breaker? If they did have ways to track all VPN traffic they wouldn't want us to know about it.

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

No, bc gvts are themselves owned by companies.

[-] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

All? No. But some? I'd be more surprised if I found out none were.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Who is gonna listen to the RIAA and MIAA?

Comcast or the CIA?

I'll take my chances. 🏴‍☠️

[-] Smeagol666@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Well I didn't until now.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, not really. Governments generally aren't that competent that it would be viable as a solution. Especially since there are legitimate uses for VPNs that aren't related to VPN providers, such as the ones that businesses use for people travelling, or working from home.

Although I could see the ones that do tracking putting a slightly higher priority on VPN traffic, just because it stands out more, where non-VPN traffic might be more likely to blend into the noise, since it matches more with how regular users use it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
263 points (88.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35864 readers
443 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS