2555
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm out of the loop, what did the SCOTUS do now?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] VictoriousStalemate@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Bad example. The cases where businesses could refuse service to a customer were due to religious freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution. Not liking Trump would not fall under that category. Not sure about the other example though.

In general though, I think this would be fine. As long as this business is not funded or supported by taxpayer money.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

The more I see news about the United States the less I'm surprised

[-] itadakimasu@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Ugh should have read "no sales to trump supporters or religious nutbags. Whoops those 2 are the same thing"

[-] Billy_Gnosis@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago

I don't have an issue with any of this. Private Business owners can sell their products or services to whoever they want. Don't see what the big deal is. If you don't like it, there's plenty more competition willing to take your money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2555 points (94.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS