182
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Speaker has promised to push forward with a Ukraine aid package once the House returns from a two-week break.

Representative Don Bacon acknowledged Sunday that it is “possible” that Speaker Mike Johnson will lose the top House job over an impending vote on aid to Ukraine. “I’m not going to deny it,” the Nebraska conservative told NBC’s Kristen Welker.

The comment comes as the House enters the second half of a two-week recess, which came on the heels of a tense fight over a government funding bill that barely averted a shutdown. Johnson entered the break promising to “turn our attention” to Ukraine, an issue that has divided the fractious House GOP caucus and kept the U.S. government from approving an aid package, even as the Senate passed a $95 billion bill in February.

George Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has long been staunchly opposed to U.S. aid to Ukraine, filed a motion to vacate Johnson’s speakership right as the House went into recess, warning that Johnson “should not bring funding for Ukraine” to the House floor. Greene has yet to say when she plans to move forward with the motion.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago

C’mon. Let’s go for the hat trick

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

Who's gonna be the next one with the dunce cap?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 7 months ago

Good chance that it'd be Jeffries. It might not be in his interest or Democrats to take it, but the possibility is sitting right there.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago

Johnson is an idiot if he took the gravel without getting rid of the vacate rule that they added. That is going to make doing anything impossible

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 7 months ago

There is no way that rule would get removed without Democratic support.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 months ago

The only issue is whether the Democrats are willing to negotiate with a rump Republican party for support and what that support will entail. It seems like Democrats are willing to negotiate with Johnson in a way they didn't feel they could with McCarthy.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

Dems aren't the ones keeping the rule around.

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Dems should cancel out these removals otherwise speakers are just gonna move more toward MTG and her pro-Russian agenda. Give them incentive to not be complete during dickheads

[-] Atom@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Damned if they do and damned if they don't. They either get condemned for helping keep a GOP speaker in place or they get criticized for not helping and getting stuck another freedom caucus pick speaker, after they bicker for a month.

[-] sepi@piefed.social 10 points 7 months ago

It's not possible for MTGs eyes to come any closer together. They're at their closest for the year right now!

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Not with that attitude

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
182 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS