NEEDS MOAR 69 FELLOW HUMAN

I'm curious, is there actually so many 42's in the system? (more than 69 sounds unlikely)

What if the LLM is getting tripped up because 42 is always referred to as the answer to "the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything".

So you ask it a question like give a number between 1-100, it answers 42 because that's the answer to "Everything", according to it's training data.

Something similar happened to Gemini. Google discouraged Gemini from giving unsafe advice because it's unethical. Then Gemini refused to answer questions about C++ because it's considered "unsafe" (referring to memory management). But Gemini thinks C++ is "unsafe" (the normal meaning), therefore it's unethical. It's like those jailbreak tricks but from its own training set.

What's the y axis?

So what? It figured out The Answer, big whoop.

Get back to me when it figures out The Question.

I petition to rename ChatGPT to DeepThought based on these results.

I spent an afternoon once playing Infinite Craft, which uses some sort of LLM behind the scenes to do it's combinations.

At one point I got 007, and found 007+007 = 0014.

The maths gets wild though, and because it's been trained on text, it has no idea when it comes to combinations of numbers it hasn't seen before. I spent ages trying to get it to 69420 and just couldn't, although I could get 42069.

Well.... I was not aware Chatgpt could make simple graphs.