205
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Residents of manufactured housing parks typically own their homes – but not the parks themselves, which can be incredibly lucrative. Now some residents are forming cooperatives, and taking control

As private owners work to maximize profit, Roc USA is fighting for a radical oppositional model: resident-owned communities, or Rocs. According to an industry analysis from 2019, the average annual rent increase in privately owned parks is 3.9%. In recent years, according to the Washington Post, some park residents have seen their rents rise much more rapidly, even doubling or tripling. According to a 2020 Roc USA analysis, the average annual rent increase in community-owned parks is just 0.9% – or $3 a year.

For the kinds of people who traditionally live in manufactured housing communities – retirees and low-income earners – the best chance to protect their housing is to take ownership of it themselves.

In February, the Biden administration announced the details of the Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement (Price) Act, which Congress passed in 2022 and mandates the creation of a $225m grant to improve manufactured housing infrastructure nationwide. The act, which Roc USA and members of its resident-owned communities lobbied for, marks the first time the federal government has laid out a funded program to support manufactured housing.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago

Mobile home co-ops make a ton of sense. Get rid of the landlord class and start having community owned properties everywhere.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

its a great concept, but a corrupted HOA is likely. Open books would help.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

This isn't really an HOA, it's a co-op that manages the properties, that's pretty different from an HOA, because they need to actually do things, and not just nitpick yards.

Regardless, it's still better than a landlord, at least you can vote out the board members.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

I mean, they can just not form an HOA while still having people own their land.

Communities already do that. I live in one.

[-] john89@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 years ago

Lot rent is a massive scam and I feel bad for anyone stuck paying it.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Buying one's home, but renting the land it is on never made sense to me. The land is the cheap part of the pair. Either rent both or buy both.

This is highly dependant on location. In cities it's often the opposite.

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's intentionally predatory. It doesn't make sense, because it's a trap you're seeing after it already sprung on someone. John Oliver did a great episode on it

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The land is the cheap part of the pair.

This is so weird to read. The appraisal on my home valued the land at about 80% of the value and the actual structure the other 20%.

[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Mobile homes are very, very rarely in cities where land values are higher than the home values. If that is the case, it is an even crazier idea to own a mobile home on extremely expensive rented land.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Marx was right.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That is almost no money and it's gonna go poof. Too little too late for the mobile home parks the Christian college shuttered in Phoenix in lieu of dorms.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

225 million is 225 million more than they have ever had, and it seems like there is an org, Roc USA, that is ready to work with that money to help people organize and take control of there own land.

Is it enough? Likely not. Will it do some good, maybe make traction on the issue so its better nationally funded in the future to help some of the poorest people in our nation? Most likely.

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, no doubt. It's just for a Christian nation we sure give shit all about the least of our people...or did Jesus relieve us of that burden.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
205 points (99.0% liked)

News

36366 readers
782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS