682
"Using a sex toy on them" When are we going to start referring to sexual assault of men as what it is?
I mean, it's sexual assault obviously, but in this case, "using a sex toy on them" provides a bit more context than just generically labeling it as "sexual assault". Sexual assault could be many different things.
The article also goes on to describe that they put the sex toys in the men's mouth. I think the "used a sex toy on them" is just more descriptive in this situation, because if they used "sexual assault", people would not be able to decipher what these POS officers actually did.
I do agree that the media can be terrible about minimizing sexual assault on men, but in this case I think the headline is more descriptive. Also , fuck these racist rapist cops.
"Raped a man with a dildo"
Brings the same point across while accentuating what actually happened.
They raped him. They forcefully penetrated him with a fake penis. That's rape even according to the current bullshit definition.
I totally agree there. They should make it as graphic and specific as possible to really show how fucked up the situation is and show how terrible the perpetrators are, at least in my opinion.
This & the word "torture" could also mean many things yet they used it as well
load more comments
(1 replies)
You "use a sex toy" on a partner.
It's not a sex toy when you don't consent; at that point, it's just being raped with a foreign object.
load more comments
(2 replies)
"Raped with a sex toy" is more descriptive and accurate and almost the same length (shorter even) as "used a sex toy on them."
He wasn’t raped. He was subjected to enhanced interrogation. Besides, they sprinkled some crack on him so it’s all good.
Because just referring to it as sexual assault, might portray that these cops where gay, and we can't have none of that.
/s
load more comments
(1 replies)
"raped" they raped him. Even by americas fucked up definition of rape. Raped him. Why can't news just say 'they raped the man' always with weird innuendos.
The police are rapists. So easy to type. Almost flows off the keys.
Woah woah woah. Let's not jump to any conclusions about everyone yet. Let's wait it out until we get all the facts before we say something so profound. Even if they did something of that nature there must be a good reason, they wouldn't make choices like that without good reasons.
/s I think this is obvious, but just in case
After reading it I feel the rape part is by far not the worst part of what they did. How long were these fucking criminals getting away with this shit. If he hadn't shot him (reads like he meant for it to not fire the second time he pulled the trigger with his gun in his mouth) then we wouldn't even know about this and they would still be out there posing as police officers
Your last paragraph is a delight to read, thank you!
It's almost a haiku. Six, five, six. Explains the flow. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Before reading: “Wow, what a sensationalist headline!”
After reading: “Somehow that headline underplayed it.”
The article doesn't even mention that the shooting happened during a forced game of Russian roulette.
It kinda does, but it doesn't make sense:
After removing a bullet from the chamber of his gun, Elward stuck a gun into Jenkins’ mouth and pulled the trigger. The gun clicked. Then he racked the slide, only this time, the gun fired a bullet
Usually Russian Roulette involves removing all of the bullets except one. This shitbag removed just one bullet. But most importantly, Russian Roulette is done with a revolver and the mention of a slide indicates it wasn't a revolver.
So... I don't know what happened here. Did this Elward shithead say he was going to do a Russian Roulette thing but didn't understand how any of that works?
Had to stop reading. I have no words.
jfc. I hope they go to prison for the maximum. That shit was hard to read.
Unfortunately, I suspect there is no way they agreed to a guilty plea without an offer on the table.
unfortunately, i think you're right. They deserve nothing less than the maximum
What the fuck did I just read...
White supremacist gang shit.
If I saw it in a movie I wouldn’t be able to suspend my disbelief.
I mean... is it wrong to hope these goon fucks get what's coming to them in prison?
"what's coming to them in prison" is just another indictment of our broken society.
Yes, it's wrong. It's understandable to want retribution, but it doesn't help improve the situation. We need to be better than that, even when our gut reaction is, "to hope these goon fucks get what's coming to them in prison?"
"Prison was fine, I didn't mind prison. Except for the anal rape part. Yah, that part I didn't enjoy much, that anal rape thing."
- Norm MacDonald
considering the prison system creates more crime, yes it's wrong
on one hand, I wish I wouldn't have to read those headlines because it depresses me
on the other hands, there's no point in muting that information, because people should know those things and should be angry
I thought "we should read good news", and then /r/upliftingnews appeared and it was just a rose-colored glasses thing.
we actually need to hear bad news to make people react.
I want to hear good news when we actually fix things. I don't want to ignore bad news or to have news mischaracterized as good.
The sad reality of the name of the newspaper being so true. This is Mississippi today. Not 400 years ago, or 60...today.
I don't often advocate for the death penalty, but fuck these pigs. They don't deserve to live. That or solitary life imprisonment.
Oh so normal policing in the US. Got it.
Gut these pigs and let em hang.
Jesus Christ on a cracker. I thought the headline was bad, and the article made it so much worse. I don’t even have words.
Hot damn is this real justice happening in Mississippi! Drain the swamp would be used in the proper context here. Monsters dressed as police officers actually being fired and facing time in prison. It's a terrible story, but I'm happy to see the long dick of the federal law is swinging down that far south.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
682 points (99.0% liked)
News
35714 readers
633 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS