967

cross-posted from: https://rabbitea.rs/post/280182

I think this is appropriate here!

‘I am a self-expressive person and I feel very confident with pink hair so I came up with a solution to keep the job and my hair’

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 182 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope her creative resistance doesn't get incorporated as part of the brand of her workplace.

EDIT: To the downvoters:

Brands have begun to incorporate some imperfections into their marketing. For example the Deutsche Bahn, our german railway company, are sometimes making jokes about how their trains are notoriously late. Are they making their service better? No. Or not noticeably so far. I think McDonalds have also made jokes about their broken soft ice machines and they did not do anything to make them more reliable. According to iFixit, they and the company making the machines have actively fought against a small company that wanted to make a tool to making fixing these machines easier.

So that's why i hope that our wig-wearing heroine doesn't just get incorporated into the marketing instead of being allowed to show her pink hair.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, the marketing version of "inclusiveness":

"We are a great, hip and youthfull place to work: just look at *picture of male model with a hipster beard* Joe from Accounting"

(Reminds me of how since about first Tech boom, Tech companies would show to the Press and prospective candidates all the amazing facilities they have for employees to relax - fuzzball tables, relax-spaces with beanbag chairs, even indoor slides - but if you're on the inside you quickly find out you're expected to work 12h/day on a never ending sequence of death marches and you'll never actually have time to use those "relax facilities")

This kind of thing is the result of about the same process as their businesswise evaluation of complying with regulations: they usually conclude that the profit maximizing option is to provide the appearence of complying whilst internally and through less explicit methods (usually all in choices that aren't explicitly justified) acting in a completelly different way.

If there is one thing companies have learned in the last 4 decades is that image managements is way cheaper (read: "profit enhancing") than actually doing the right things and delivers pretty much the same results if in influencing those external to the company.

One can trust a corporation about as much as one can trust a known sociopath.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

One a sidenote, I never got the point of e.g. xbox rooms and ping pong tables in offices. Why the hell would I want to relax in a place of work? I want to do my work, then go home (to relax). Playing 30 min video games in the afternoon would mean that happens 30 mins later.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago

dress codes have always been rooted in racism & sexism. there's absolutely no reason a job should control your hair unless it disrupts business, not for "offending conservatives"

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago

"They think this is better?"

Yes, they actually do. They're probably conservative dickheads. They know that pink hair is code for "I am a tolerant and kind person; I might be gay but not necessarily; I support counterculture ideas."

They hate the counterculture ideas. They don't hate the color pink. Covering it up with a terrible wig makes it about something else.

Or anyway, so they think. What they've actually done is given her an opportunity to start conversations about the pink hair.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago

What they’ve actually done is given her an opportunity to start conversations about the pink hair.

Keen insight. I wouldn't have known she exists otherwise.

[-] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

They’re probably conservative dickheads.

Hah! It doesn't even take that. All you need is a middle-management who doesn't support the rights of their workforce, is inconvenienced should a customer gin up complaints about OP's hair-color (whatever it is), and is generally just lazy and indifferent, learning from upper mgmt that growth & profits are 99% the things that count, followed by limiting liability situations. The workers themselves are just an inconvenient expense in the equation.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Capitolist have controlled out bodies for far too long.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago
[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Probably not, in a previous job my hair (wig or real) had to be a "natural" colour.

[-] UnbeatenDeployGoofy@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

landed a front-of-house role in the hospitality industry without a face-to-face or video interview

Seems like the flawed interviewing process is to blame.

[-] sudo@lemmy.today 41 points 1 year ago

Yes, so they could discriminate her based on her looks sooner?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Terrible?

This woman has great taste in wigs. I dig them.

[-] NightLily@lemmy.basedcount.com 10 points 1 year ago
[-] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

You better believe those quotes, cause those wigs are fantastic

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
967 points (97.4% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS