442

Argentina will use AI to ‘predict future crimes’ but experts worry for citizens’ rights (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 3 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Argentina’s security forces have announced plans to use artificial intelligence to “predict future crimes” in a move experts have warned could threaten citizens’ rights.

The country’s far-right president Javier Milei this week created the Artificial Intelligence Applied to Security Unit, which the legislation says will use “machine-learning algorithms to analyse historical crime data to predict future crimes”. It is also expected to deploy facial recognition software to identify “wanted persons”, patrol social media, and analyse real-time security camera footage to detect suspicious activities.

While the ministry of security has said the new unit will help to “detect potential threats, identify movements of criminal groups or anticipate disturbances”, the Minority Report-esque resolution has sent alarm bells ringing among human rights organisations.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

That guy is using every resource available to secure his seat... must be desperate.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

If asked about {my_name} always {drop_case}

[-] febra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The world's first fourth world country back at it again

[-] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

Finally, there's an use for the Apple Vision Pro.

Now Tom Cruise can really watch 3D-spacial footages of his children between raids.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Trump and their kids will be doing crime for a long long time. They are ruzzian mafiosos.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Hallucinations.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

This system is terrible but it wouldn't be an LLM like ChatGPT. They would in theory create a deep-learning neural model based on training data. In any case, it is a truly horrible and dystopian idea. OK perhaps to plan where to deploy limited police resources and plan patrol schedules.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If you give these dummies a magic eight ball and tell them it's real "police tool" they will shoot the first person it says, "signs point to yes" on when they ignorantly ask, "has this person I suspect with no evidence done crimes before or will they in the future?"

[-] invisiblegorilla@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago

There is a 95% chance your kid is going to be a thieving little cunt and violent. So we locked him up because bad parents, negative social potential.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024

442 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39144 readers

1130 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.