109

I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago
[-] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Very interesting. Thank you!

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

13 months would be great for salaried employees too (so long as the pay per month isn't reduced, which, well, of course it will be, but a man can dream)

[-] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

The one I am looking for counts the remaining days to total nuclear annihilation.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Chinese calendar?

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

now could always be zero with future positive and past negative. serious refactoring

[-] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That is one interesting approach. I like it.

[-] oleorun@real.lemmy.fan 1 points 3 months ago
[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

ask ntp. they breath this stuff. https://www.ntp.org/

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
109 points (91.0% liked)

science

14890 readers
30 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS