27
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I believe this is meant to seem like a lot of money for a photographer, but it's honestly not anymore in California. Especially not for a famous photographer.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

The top salary for a teacher in San Francisco is $97k.

Why does he need a famous photographer?

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That should have probably more been the angle they should have taken.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Idk about SF specifically but some other districts go noticably higher once you have been in the system for a while.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

For his future presidential run, of course.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago

The question is more, why is the taxpayer paying for glamour shots that will just end up being used in his future campaigns? At least use campaign funds instead of tax payer money.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

As I said in the other comment, the author should have probably made that the angle instead. Naming and shaming is just and only that.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What is this? A paycheck for ants?!

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 2 months ago

I don't care, he can use the selfie mode on a potato phone like the rest of us while he's fucking over the homeless.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So almost enough to afford a studio apartment? Neat!

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 2 months ago

This is where the phrase "limousine liberal" comes from.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Politico - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Politico:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/09/gavin-newsom-celebrity-photographer-00173482
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
27 points (82.9% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS