121
submitted 3 months ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

Dana Mattioli speaks about her new book, The Everything War, which examines how Amazon came to dominate the U.S. economy through its “scorched-earth” tactics.

“I found just a ton of business practices driven by this toxic culture at Amazon, where the company lied, spied, cheated its way to the top,” she says. Mattioli also discusses the threat of antitrust lawsuits to Amazon and other Big Tech firms, political pressure on U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and more.

[...] Amazon has had a really bumpy history with both the [U.S.} Republicans, specifically Donald Trump, and also the [U.S.] Democrats. You know, [U.S. President Joe] Biden has been really tough on Amazon. He put in place Lina Khan, the head of the Federal Trade Commission, the agency overseeing them. And she brought forward this historic monopoly lawsuit against the company last year.

[...]

Two major Democratic donors, media mogul Barry Diller and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, have publicly called for Kamala Harris to fire FTC Chair Lina Khan, who has led Biden’s antitrust efforts — that’s if Kamela Harris becomes president. Hoffman sits on the board of Microsoft, which was sued by the FTC.

[...]

Lina Khan has become this lightning rod in CEO circles, but specifically in tech circles. We’ve seen CEOs and VCs become very frustrated with the FTC under Lina Khan, because she’s been very critical of them. She’s taken a very close look at their companies. They’ve brought lawsuits against all Big Four tech companies, between the DOJ and the FTC, as well as other companies. So it’s not surprising. But Biden has been a staunch advocate of hers.

[...]

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stefenauris@pawb.social 34 points 3 months ago

A tech company becomes dominant through underhanded tactics? Say it ain't so!

Kind of reads like Microsoft's rise to dominance. Good find!

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 3 months ago

Kind of reads like Microsoft's rise to dominance.

Microshit pioneered the strategy.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 3 months ago

IBM could have done it more but they came from a time of laws not allowing that behaviour. So they just did not change with the times.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 8 points 3 months ago

IBM was the biggest help to Microsoft and gave them that revolutionary contract.

Good thing Bill's mommy was on the board to make sure everything runs smoothly.

[-] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago

AT&T simply had the laws protect them from competition for 105 years.

[-] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago

If John Oliver's segment on Amazon was correct, then Amazon is much worse than Microsoft. Microsoft didn't force their employees to pee in bottles and work them ragged until they had severe burnout or became physically disabled.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

Only psychopaths are capable of becoming billionaires.

Normal people would share or cut fair deals to those involved, as a society we need to say enough is enough and tax them so there is no such thing as a billionaire.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37754 readers
276 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS